Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06521-02
Original file (06521-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

MEH: ddj
Docket No:
5 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

’s naval record

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application; together with all material submitted in
record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 10
attached.

support thereof, your spouse ’s naval
In addition, the Board considered the
October 2002, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

NAVY 

PERSONNEL 

COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIV
MILLINGTON TN 38055000

E

0

10 

Ott

 0 2

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL 

RECORDS  

(BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

(a) BCNR memo of 26 Jul 02
(b) Department of Defense Directive 1332.27,

Survivor Benefit Plan of 4 Jan 74

(1) Survivor Benefit Plan  
(2) Survivor Benefit Plan  
(3) Ltr from

mailout  of 15 Mar 79
mailout  of 29 Nov 79

of 18 Jun 01

Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

commend the BCNR not correct
ecord  to reflect that he
rage in the Reserve

2.

The recommendation is based on the following:

Retired -Reserve,
6 April 1981.

without pay, on 1

ransferred to the

July 1970.

He died

b.

Public Law 95-397 enacted 30 September 1978, permitted
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) participation by reservists who met
all eligibility requirements except for the age factor.
was an open enrollment period that commenced 1 October 1978 to
and was later extended to 31 March 1980.
30 September 1979,
Until then,
eligible for participation in the Plan.

reservists not in receipt of retired pay, were not

There

C .

Based on enclosures (1) and  

Reserve Personnel Center (NRPC),
enrollment period was mailed to
in March and November 1979. He
mailings.

(2),  obtained from   the Naval

information regarding the open

has previously indicated in enclosure (3)

which he cited,

SBP, though at that time they were ineligible.
that her attorney was not aware that the provisions of
reference (b),
unless they the reserve member was in receipt of retired pay.
It is unfortunate that
enroll in the   RCSBP when offered in 1979, however, without such
there is no entitlement to annuity
an election to participate,
for his widow.

were not applicable in this case

It also appears

did not

Program Manager
Survivor Benefit Plan,
Retired Activities and GI Bill
Programs Branch (PERS-664)

2



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075287C070403

    Original file (2002075287C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant provides a DD Form 1883 dated 8 May 1986 showing the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount, option C. Apparently, the Iowa National Guard returned this DD Form 1883 to the National Guard Bureau by letter dated 13 May 1986. It appears that the FSM's 1986 request for enrollment in the RCSBP was generated when a team...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016420C070206

    Original file (20050016420C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 September 1989, the FSM died at age 51. There is no evidence of record to show the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), one of which should have been sent to him, with a cover letter, by mail around July 1979. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he completed a DD Form 1883 on 1 July 1979 and elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse coverage, full...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080017777

    Original file (AR20080017777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that either his 1990 RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election be changed from Option C-Spouse Only-Reduced Annuity to Option A-Defer or that he be permitted to increase his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to an annuity based on the full amount of retired pay effective upon reaching age 60 without a concurrent change to the RCSBP coverage. The applicant states that when he submitted his retirement package at age 60 he elected full SBP benefits. He...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06758-01

    Original file (06758-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. It was amended and d. A member who was eligible for retired pay under United States Code, Chapter 1223, on 30 September or who received by 30 June Title 10, 1978, but who was under age 60, 1979, a notification of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010144

    Original file (20090010144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090010144 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s DD Form 2656-11 shows that on 8 January 2009 he verified that he had been notified by DFAS of the requirement to have 360 plus months toward Paid-Up SBP. Effective 1 October 2008, no reduction may be made in the retired pay of a participant in the SBP for any month after the later of : (1) the 360th month for which the participant’s retired pay is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074187C070403

    Original file (2002074187C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s 20-year letter was dated 6 August 1979 and his first DD Form 1883, in which he elected children only RCSBP coverage, was dated 19 May 1980. On 1 December 1980, within one year of his marriage, he elected to provide RCSBP coverage for his new spouse (and children) as by law he had the right to. At that time, his spouse costs were reinstated based upon his full retired pay (as provided by his original election of coverage and as he requested on the DD Form 1882).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08663-07

    Original file (08663-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    08663-07 22 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 19, 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007305

    Original file (20130007305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Despite this, there is no documentation in his record that shows he elected to participate in the RCSBP after receiving his 15-year letter. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provides a means for those who have qualified for Reserve retirement, but who are not yet age 60 [upon which they would be eligible to begin drawing retired pay, upon request, and to participate in the SBP], to provide an annuity to their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013797

    Original file (20100013797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his military records be corrected by changing his Reserve Component (RC) Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from "children only" to "spouse" coverage. A DD Form 1883, dated 7 March 1987, shows the applicant enrolled in the RCSBP for "spouse and children" coverage, option C, full base amount. The applicant married in October 1984 and he had 1 year from his date of marriage to enroll in the RCSBP for spouse coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073661C070403

    Original file (2002073661C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. As supporting evidence, she provides their marriage certificate, his death certificate, a 5 August 1953 letter appointing the FSM as a Reserve commissioned officer, and an 8 March 1960 letter, Subject: Completion of 20 years of Satisfactory Federal Service Creditable for Retirement. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had...