DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TIR
Docket No: 8422-10
24 June 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2] June 2011. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 25 May 1990 under the Delayed Entry
Program (DEP) at age 18. On 2 April 1991 you began a period of
active duty and served without disciplinary incident.
Subsequently, you were referred for a psychiatric evaluation and
diagnosed with a personality disorder. As a result, you were
recommended for an expeditious administrative separation. In May
1991 you were processed for an administrative separation by
reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed
personality disorder. On 6 May 1991 the discharge authority
directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of
convenience of the government due to a diagnosed personality
disorder. On 13 May 1991, while serving in paygrade E-3, you
were go discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth, post service conduct, and desire to change your
reenlistment code and narrative reason for separation. It also
considered your letter of explanation regarding the time served
and psychiatric evaluations. Nevertheless, the Board concluded
these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your
reenlistment code or narrative reason for separation because of
the your diagnosed personality disorder and subsequent
nonrecommendation for reenlistment. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.
The Board suggested that you may wish to apply for a waiver of
yeur RE-4 reenlistment code with branches of the armed forces
other than the Navy.
P
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\o\ut
W. DEAN P
Executive B4 etor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00403-11
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2011. On 15 August 1989 you were notified of pending separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board concluded that the narrative reason for separation was administratively and procedurally correct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04744-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In February 1994 you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06785-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08086-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regu1atio~ 5 and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07614-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07446-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 January 1992 the discharge authority directed an On 7 February 1992 you were so discharged The Board also considered your performance The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04732-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11385-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that the severity of your diagnosed personality disorder was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10646-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In connection with this processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and the discharge authority would have approved a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05654-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2010. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.