DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
REC
Docket No: 07972-10
19 April 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 April 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
18 April 1988, at age 17. On 19 July 1988, you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for being absent from your appointed
place of duty. On 29 January 1993, you received NJP for failure
to obey a lawful order. On 20 September 1993, 4a mental health
evaluation was conducted, and you were diagnosed with a
personality disorder, an adjustment disorder with anxious mood,
with boarderline and passive aggressive traits. Based on the
mental health evaluation, you were honorably discharged by reason
of your personality disorder. After you were advised of your
rights, you elected to receive copies of documents to be
forwarded to the separation authority, but waived all your other
procedural rights. Subsequently, on 30 September 1993, you were
discharged with an honorable characterization of service by
reason of your diagnosed personality disorder. At that time, you
were assigned a reentry code of RE-3G.
In its review of your application, the Board considered all
Mitigating factors, such as your youth. However, the Board found
these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your
narrative reason for separation or separation code due to your
diagnosed personality disorder. The Board noted that applicable
regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3G reentry code to
individuals who are separated due to medical conditions that
interfere with duty performance and misconduct. The Board thus
concluded that there is no error or injustice in your narrative
reason for separation or separation code. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
oF the panel wails be furnished upon request.
-
~
eis regretted’tha€ the circumstances of your case are such that
.favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsidey¥ its decision upon submission of new and material
. evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
‘Rua’
W. DEAN t
Executive © or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11615-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16, August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material -submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00403-11
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2011. On 15 August 1989 you were notified of pending separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board concluded that the narrative reason for separation was administratively and procedurally correct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05615-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05954-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2011. The Board noted that you received the most favorable reentry code under the circumstances of your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06656-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. The Board also noted that you were fortunate to receive a general discharge since a separation under other than honorable conditions is often directed when an individual is found to have committed misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08622-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07514-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service or reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13006-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06664-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 10 March 1988, you were notified that administrative discharge procedures were initiated and that you would receive a general discharge and a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07274-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...