Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05921-10
Original file (05921-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BUG
Docket No: 5921-10
20 August 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: oe :
REVIEW OF N ORD

Ref; (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 28 May 10

 

(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 24 Jun 10
(3) Subj’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry
dated 13 June 2002, a copy of which is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Pfeiffer and
Washington, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 19
August 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies which
were available under existing law and regulations within the
Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office
with cognizance over the subject matter of this case has
commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
c. The page 11 on which the contested entry appears also
includes uncontested entries.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an
error warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by, removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 13 June 2002. This is to be accomplished by
reconstructing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum
was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that
the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s

proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Senathin/ § (abare

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it
is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken

under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

WS
W. DEAN P
Executive Dhte

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01965-10

    Original file (01965-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 27 June 2002 and his undated rebuttal, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Ivins and McBride, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 July 2010, and pursuant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03524-10

    Original file (03524-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 22 July 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1llb (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 April 1998. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01920-10

    Original file (01920-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 20 March 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Ivins and McBride, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 July 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04809-08

    Original file (04809-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 5 February and 6 March 2002. The Board, consisting of Ms. Guill and Messrs. McBride and Shy, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07383-09

    Original file (07383-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying his data in the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) by removing the weight control entry dated 14 August 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (2). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5737 14

    Original file (NR5737 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. NR5737-14 29 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: EE osc, oo a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 16 0.8

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03744-10

    Original file (03744-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ° ue : BUG Docket No: 3744-10 22 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] :

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04198-10

    Original file (04198-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 6 August 2008, a copy of which is in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Chapman and Garst, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2010, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0955 14

    Original file (NR0955 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010. Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05704-02

    Original file (05704-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters Marine Corps office request has commented to the effect CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an following corrective action. application with the supporting document MC0 P1070.12H, (IRAM), Marine Corps Individual Records Administration authorizes commanders to make Service Record Book 2. These page 11 entries meet the elements of a proper page 11 entry per paragraph required when a...