DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BIG
Docket No: 1926-10
2 July 2010
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
Seer
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 dtd 10 Feb 10
(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 18 May 10
(3) Subj’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry
dated 20 March 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Ivins and McBride,
reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 July 2010, and
pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the
Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies which
were available under existing law and regulations within the
Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office
with cognizance over the subject matter of this case commented
to the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an
error and injustice warranting the following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 20 March 2008. This is to be accomplished by
physically removing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum
was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that
the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
: Drevntiiens b [afer
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it
is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01766-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 29 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hess and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 April 2010, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04198-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 6 August 2008, a copy of which is in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Chapman and Garst, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2010, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07383-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying his data in the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) by removing the weight control entry dated 14 August 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (2). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03744-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ° ue : BUG Docket No: 3744-10 22 April 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] :
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04627-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2007 to 2 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. Petitioner further requested removing the service record page llc (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 5 February and 4 March 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03933-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11A (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 16 October 2008, reflecting assignment of a reenlistment code of “RE-30 [refused orders assigned without sufficient obligated service remaining].” A copy of this entry is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11
The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06893-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed-enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 5 April to 31 December 2006 (denied on 20 March 2008, docket number 1029-08), 1 January to 31 December 2007, 1 January to 26 May 2008, 27 May to 30 June 2008, 1 July to 26 September 2008, 27 September to 31 December 2008, 1 January to 8 May 2009 and 9 May to 31...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09950-10
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geberth, McBride and Pfeiffer, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 30 September 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies which were available under existing law...