Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03524-10
Original file (03524-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BUG
Docket No: 3524-10
23 July 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

  

Subj

Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: {1) DD Form 149 dtd 2 Mar 10 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 18 May 10
(3) Subj’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in
effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page lib (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry
dated 9 April 1998, a copy of which is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and
Swarens, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 22 July
2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,

finds as follows:

a. Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies which
were available under existing law and regulations within the

Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office
with cognizance over page 11 entries commented to the effect
that the contested page 11b entry should be removed.

c. The page 11b on which the contested entry appears also
includes uncontested entries.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds an
error and injustice warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION ;

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 1llb (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 9 April 1998. This is to be accomplished by
reconstructing the page 11b on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

e. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c})) it is certified that a quorum
was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that
the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter. .

Dwurth fF, fArotpon

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it

is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the

Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Executive oO

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5893 13

    Original file (NR5893 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11b (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 6 July 2012 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Chapman and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 October 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00380-10

    Original file (00380-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11B (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 5 June 2009, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. Humphrey and Nappo and Mr. Genteman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 April 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2815 14

    Original file (NR2815 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected by removing the fitness report for 25 February to 4 July 2011 (copy at Tab A} and the service record page 11b (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 May 2011 {copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04627-10

    Original file (04627-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2007 to 2 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. Petitioner further requested removing the service record page llc (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 5 February and 4 March 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05921-10

    Original file (05921-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 13 June 2002, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Pfeiffer and Washington, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2010, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11

    Original file (06664-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12164-08

    Original file (12164-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to.as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 31 May 2005 (copy at Tab A) and modifying his Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data by deleting the weight control entries for 8 February 1997 to 22 March 2000 and 1 March to 25 July 2005 (copy at Tab B).. The Board substantially concurs...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01965-10

    Original file (01965-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 27 June 2002 and his undated rebuttal, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Ivins and McBride, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 July 2010, and pursuant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14

    Original file (NR4745 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5737 14

    Original file (NR5737 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. NR5737-14 29 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: EE osc, oo a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 16 0.8