DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
DIC
Docket No. 2168-10
1 Jun 11
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tore Secretary of the Navy
Subj}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC Memo 7220 PERS-8354/034 dtd 13 Dec 10
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to adjust the member’s Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD), and Active Duty
Service Date (ADSD).
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and
Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 31 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. 2168-10
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:
a. Petitioner's PEBD is 9 March 1982, vice any other date, and
ADSD is 7 September 1998.
b. Note: Petitioner originally entered active service (United
States Army) on 23 March 1966. Accordingly, it will be necessary for
DFAS to recalculate member’s retired pay account under the Final Pay
law.
c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS‘ L
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
1 Jun 11 A ri BS
FA_W. DEAN Sa SOS ot IFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9239 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect a mandatory retirement date (MRD) of 1 July 2008 or a date otherwise compatible with 30 years of active service computed from his Active ‘Duty Service Date (ADSD) of 20 February 1978. The opinion went on to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02168-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2168-03 23 April 2003 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Subject’s naval record 1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leernan, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2992 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner signed and accepted her officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office on 24 May 2013 yiee 3 July 2013, that her Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD) he corrected toe reflect the same and that she be reimbursed all pay and allowances authorized due to the change . 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalmen, Exnicios...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05858-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04764-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09206-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dunn, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. H erd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07718-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the Petitioner’s original Date of Rank of 1 April 2006 be reinstated and that his Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD) of 20 January 1999 be reinstated.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 May 2008 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03624-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner ’s retainer pay in the Fleet Reserve is based on having over 22 years for pay purposes. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Frankfurt, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04343-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2010. Because of your neglect, the impact that the ADSD and PEBD error had on the probability of earlier advancement becomes highly speculative. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.