DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
NAVY ANNEX
e JRE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 1) et No. 1905-10
25 March 20106
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Sub}: FORMER SR, <@areaen
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C, 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
(2) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with’
this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be
corrected to show that she was assigned a more favorable reentry
code than RE-4. ‘
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ‘mh. wie 223
RMBRME! coved Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 4 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
c. Pétitioner served on active duty in the Navy from 29 June
to 17 July 2009, when she was discharged by reason of erroneous
entry based on a diagnosis of nystagmus, amblyopia deprivation
(lazy eye), which existed prior to her enlistment. She was
assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as permitted by governing
directives.
d. A Sailor being discharged by reason of erroneous entry may
be assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4 in the discretion of
the discharge authority.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner failed to submit sufficient
evidence to demonstrate that she was improperly assigned a
reentry code of RE-4. It concludes further, however, that it
would be in the interest of justice in her case to remove the
stigma associated with the RE-4 reentry code. Accordingly, the
Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
she was assigned a reentry code of RE-3E vice RE-4.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(¢)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled mattey’. Vie
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN ES R. EXNICIOS
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
\Sroa Glas
W. DEAN PF
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06101 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 CRS Docket No: 6101-12 20 May 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code she was assigned on 29...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11724-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 1 September 2009. A Sailor who is found to pe not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative, pe separated by reason of erroneous entry and assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner's reason for separation be changed to erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01756-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting hER naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 January 2009. The Board, consisting of Mr - ieee, Mr. im and Ms. WME ceviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08512-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 2 April 2008. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 23 January 2008. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of either an RE-3E or RE-4 reentry code to an individual separated for erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00748-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 November 2007. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 5 September 2007. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of either an RE-3E or RE-4 reentry code to an individual separated for erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05963-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 12 August 2005. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment vice the reason for separation now of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 12 August 2005 she received an entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06071-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval: records be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 20 May 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 20 May 2008, she was separated from the Navy with an entry level separation by reason of her...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04413-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 11 April 2007. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 12 March 2007. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment vice the reason for separation now of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04572-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 4572-08 26 June 2008 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records From: To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: ORMER “3a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code she was assigned on 18 September 2006. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02391-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS, Docket No: 2391-08 26 June 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER@iRy ee ca REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 November 2004. Applicable directives...