Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05963-07
Original file (05963-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 CCaRS
Docket No: 5963-07

 

 
 

8 May 2008
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: FORMER sili cties Stee. REVIEW
OF NAVAL RECORD
‘Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) Case Summary

(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner

applied to this Board requesting that her naval record be
corrected by changing the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 12 August

2005.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. QR, We, anc Sie

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 May
2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the

corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by

the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as

follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 21 June 2005. A
medical evaluation on 8 July 2005 found that she had asthnia.

c. On 1 August 2005 Petitioner’s commanding officer
recommended separation. On 12 August 2005 she received an entry
level separation by reason of her failure to meet
medical/physical procurement standards. She was assigned an RE-4

reentry code.

d. Applicable directives state that only an RE-4 reentry
code can be assigned for failure to meet medical/physical
procurement standards. An individual may be separated due to
erroneous enlistment if the enlistment would not have occurred if
the relevant facts had been known. Applicable directives
authorize the assignment of either an RE-3E or RE-4 reentry code

to an individual separated for erroneous enlistment.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the

Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board believes that the reason for discharge should
be changed to erroneous enlistment since Petitioner was unaware
of her condition. Accordingly, the Board recommends that
Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous
enlistment vice the reason for separation now of record.

The Board also concludes that an RE-3E reentry code should be
assigned since there is no evidence that Petitioner had any
performance or disciplinary infractions during her brief period
of service and her record does not otherwise support the more

stigmatizing code of RE-4.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 12 August 2005 she received an entry level separation by
reason of erroneous enlistment and an RE-3E reentry code, vice
the reason for separation and reentry code actually assigned

on that date.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

 

ROBERT D.. ZSALMAN ES :
Recorder cting Récorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

W. DEAN PFET}

Executive Dik

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04413-07

    Original file (04413-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 11 April 2007. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 12 March 2007. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment vice the reason for separation now of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01756-09

    Original file (01756-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting hER naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 January 2009. The Board, consisting of Mr - ieee, Mr. im and Ms. WME ceviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06071-08

    Original file (06071-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval: records be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 20 May 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 20 May 2008, she was separated from the Navy with an entry level separation by reason of her...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04752-07

    Original file (04752-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board, requesting a change in her RE-4 reenlistment code and reason for discharge (“Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards”)- 2. She was discharged with an entry level separation, assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code, and a JFW separation code on 9 March 2006.f. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.c.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04814-09

    Original file (04814-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX HIN 70- WAS GTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 4814-09 15 Gune 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: FORMER qq me: REVIEW OF .NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Enel: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), -Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the basis for her...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07401-09

    Original file (07401-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100cpa Docket No: 7401-09 5 October 2009 ° From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER agagiieeeoseemes Meme REVIEW OF - NAVAL’ RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 8 August 2007. Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02391-08

    Original file (02391-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS, Docket No: 2391-08 26 June 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER@iRy ee ca REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 November 2004. Applicable directives...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11724-09

    Original file (11724-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 1 September 2009. A Sailor who is found to pe not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative, pe separated by reason of erroneous entry and assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner's reason for separation be changed to erroneous entry.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10966-07

    Original file (10966-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. "\ijiililimg, and Messrs. WNR@lie and a: reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2008 and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show, as an exception to policy, that he was assigned an reentry code of RE- 3E on 16 December 2005. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01601-09

    Original file (01601-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr =i DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1601-09 8 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Qi OF NAVAL RECORD . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 19 May 2005. as ieee, and Ms. RB reviewed...