Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08782-09
Original file (08782-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5190

 

SIN
Docket No: 08782-09
29 April 2010

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United

States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 April 2010. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with ali
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or

injustice.

The Board found you began a period of active duty in the Navy on
16 December 1999. The Board noted that the record reflects that
you were honorably discharged by reason of convenience of the
government due to a personality disorder on 29 September 2000.
At that time you were assigned an RE-3G reenlistment code. In
this regard, you were assigned the least stigmatizing
reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Be advised that
such a code may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires that a
waiver be obtained from recruiting personnel who are responsible

for determining whether you meet the requirements for
reenlistment .

The Board, in its review of your record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and desire to change your RE-3G reenlistment code.
Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not
sufficient to warrant such changes because of your diagnosed
personality disorder which rendered you incapable of continued
service. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a personality
disorder would normally be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Again, you were assigned the appropriate reenlistment code for
your situation. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09186-09

    Original file (09186-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this regard, you were assigned the least stigmatizing appropriate reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a personality disorder would normally be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05615-09

    Original file (05615-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07514-09

    Original file (07514-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service or reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02571-08

    Original file (02571-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Further, regulations authorize assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code to service members who are discharged due to a personality disorder and such a code is not considered derogatory. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07446-98

    Original file (07446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 January 1992 the discharge authority directed an On 7 February 1992 you were so discharged The Board also considered your performance The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06902-02

    Original file (06902-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06555-07

    Original file (06555-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 September 2002 at age 20. You served over two years without incident...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13006-09

    Original file (13006-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08546-08

    Original file (08546-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code to service members who are discharged due to other physical/mental condition due to a personality disorder, and it is not considered derogatory. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07972-10

    Original file (07972-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your narrative reason for separation or separation code due to...