DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH
Docket No. 12842-09
1 Mar 10 :
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March
2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 3 Feb 10,
a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. The criteria set forth in
COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8H, Chapter 3, Section 7, Page 3, authorize
enlistment in paygrade E-2 for one Delayed Entry Program (DEP)
referral who subsequently accesses into the Nuclear Field; or two
(non-Nuclear) referrals. You referred one applicant who enlisted for
the GSE rating and was later reclassified as a Navy Diver. Since he
did not access into the Nuclear Field you do not meet the established
criteria for enlistment in paygrade E-2 based on DEP referrals.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. 12842-0909
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFET
Executive Di
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09910-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ‘BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX . WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 9910-08 11 May 09 ——
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01740-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07647-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or paygrade accession via the PRISE III program, except for the AECF, injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06370-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. names and votes of the paygrade accession via the PRISE III program, except for AECF, CTI(N), paygrade E3. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08025-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 16 October 2002 802502 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. the applicant enlisted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08968-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2009. This however, does not confirm that they were referrals of yours, and NRD Richmond was unable to locate any documentation that would support your claim. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02907-99
A threemember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Original record indicates HT3-signed was aware that his request to enlist in paygrade E5 was disapproved due to being overmanned at the E5 paygrade and he acknowledge that his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05478-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 05478-01 except for paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is Recommend disapproval of enclosure 1. the maximum E-3, Field(NF).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07260-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...