Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12276-09
Original file (12276-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

Lec
Docket No. 12276-09
25 Feb 10

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj}: REVIEW _OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/006 of 4 Jan 10
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on

22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
:

Docket No. 12276-09

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

‘a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade H-4 effective
16 February 2007. — :

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It i8 certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the
Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. 4SALMAN WILLTAM J. HESS, III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
{32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
{a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

\
25 February 2010 \Wouk

W. DEAN P R
Executive rector

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10043-09

    Original file (10043-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, salman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11654-09

    Original file (11654-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(/e) of the revised Procedures of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06452-09

    Original file (06452-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20376-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsaiman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06207-09

    Original file (06207-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/005 of 4 Jan 2010 {3) Subject’s naval record 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWR1 from the September 2008 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04578-09

    Original file (04578-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to the rank of private first class/E-2 on 6 July 2005 and lance corporal/E-3 on 1 April 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10825-09

    Original file (10825-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/MT2 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12694-09

    Original file (12694-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to HM3/E-4 from the September 2008 Navy-wide cycle 200 advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08333-09

    Original file (08333-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/MM3, from the September 2007 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, “salman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12875-09

    Original file (12875-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13020-09

    Original file (13020-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was meritoriously advanced upon his graduation from Operation Specialist (OS) “A” school on 29 July 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 March 2010 and, pursuant to its...