DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 04578-09
25 February 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO ay
Ref; (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) HOMC memo 1400/4 MMPR-2 of 27 Jun 08
(3) HOMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 8 Jan 2010
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show that Petitioner was advanced to the rank of private first
class/E-2 on 6 July 2005 and lance corporal/E-3 on 1 April 2005.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
22 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorabie action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Decket No. 04578-0609
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner’s record is to reflect advancement to private
first class/E-2 on 6 July 2004.
b. Petitioner’s record is to reflect advancement to lance
corporal/E-3 on 1 April 2005.
c. A copy of. this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter. S
ROBERT D. “SALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
25 February 2010 TR DD
you_W. DEAN EIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5048 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO5048-14 21 November 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy =): ey Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD.Form 149 w/attachments i {2) Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1400-3-MMPR-2 of 28 Oct 2014 (3) Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1070 MIQ of 26 Sept 2014 a i. Pursuant to the provisions of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00444-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s date of rank to SGT/E-5 be effective 1 April 2001 vice 1 October 2001. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00001-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his promotion suspension was removed, promote to lance corporal with a date of rank of 1 March 2008, return the pay that was recouped because of an erroneous promotion. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9450 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. NR9450-14 27 Apr 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: an OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03869-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was advanced to E-5/Sgt with an effective date of rank of 1 July 2008. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07383-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying his data in the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) by removing the weight control entry dated 14 August 2008, a copy of which is at enclosure (2). The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00772-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/SGT on 1 August 2003, prior to her separation from active duty on 24 August 2003. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03951-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. request contains two prior service with the same date phonecon with Per a time of was discharged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5809 13
MIQ did not address the entries dated 23 May or 17 July 2012. c. In enclosure (3), JAM, the HOMC Judge Advocate Division, Military Justice Branch commented to the effect that all the entries at issue should be removed, because the entries dated 23 January, 23 May and 17 July 2012 were improperly backdated, and the entries dated 20 January and 23 March 2012 were issued after Petitioner should have been promoted on 1 May 2011. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing - the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR1705 15
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to back date an advancement. The Board, consisting a. jy 4g reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and 1 stice on 30 April 2015 and, pursuant to its...