DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20870-5100
BAN
Docket ‘No. 13020-0939
8 March 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO FG
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
{2} NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/060 of 25 Jan 10
(3) Subject’s naval record :
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show that Petitioner was meritoriously advanced upon his graduation
from Operation Specialist (OS) “A” school on 29 July 2008.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
8 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. ,
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
ce
Docket No. 13020-09
existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:
a. Petitioner's record is to reflect advancement to E-2 with an
effective date of 29 July 2008 and advancement to E-3 with an
effective date of 16 May 2009.
b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c}) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN WILLIAM J. ew
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6({e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a}, has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
8 March 2010 \3 CO
Q
W. DEAN PPEIR
Executive Dik
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00571-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/GM2 from the March 2008, Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10548-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement to EM1/E6 should be backdated from the March 2008 (cycle 199) Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03942-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR GORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-2 effective 30 May 2007, E-3 effective 21 November 2007," and E-4 effective 16 May 2008, 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10043-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, salman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01635-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/CTR1 from the February 2008, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, “salman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08287-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's advancement to LS1/E6 should be backdated to the August 2008 (cycle 083) Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04251-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-6/YN1 from the February 2008, Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 August 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04771-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was advanced to B-6/UT1 from the February 2008 Navy-wide advancement exam. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02032-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Lcc Docket No: 2032-10 9 Mar 10 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Qi REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11654-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 February 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(/e) of the revised Procedures of the...