Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11919-09
Original file (11919-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH |
Docket No. 11919-09
15 Mar 10

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. ‘

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March
2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material

submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On
15 December 2008 you completed an Associates of Arts in Business from
AXIA College of University of Phoenix. In accordance with
COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8H, postsecondary education must meet the
standards of the American Council on Education’s Accredited
Institutions of Post Secondary Education (AIPE). AXIA college does
not meet the AIPE standard. Accordingly, your application has been

denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is

on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\oQomG

W. DEAN PPEI
Executive Dir

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12632-09

    Original file (12632-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 12632-0939 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09725-09

    Original file (09725-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 9725-09 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05402-11

    Original file (05402-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2011. Under the governing regulations, to be eligible to transfer benefits, a member must be on active duty or in the selected reserve at the time of the election to transfer. Your application claims, essentially, that your failure shoulda be excused because you were erroneously informed by the Navy College Office that you were “good to go” aiter...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04180-00

    Original file (04180-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. completed six semester hours of college.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10629-10

    Original file (10629-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04635-04

    Original file (04635-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of Annex A to DD Form 4 reveals that he was not guaranteed an EBCC. He is therefore not entitled to receive an EBCC. Per enclosure (1) and reference (a), Applicants with college level foreign education who have satisfactorily completed the U.S. equivalent of 45 semester hours at a college or university accredited for post secondary education, may be enlisted as an in paygrade E-3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03054-11

    Original file (03054-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying fer a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-01

    Original file (06813-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07741-02

    Original file (07741-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition., the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_49_23 CDT 2000

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not all applicants are offered the NCF Program.