DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
REC
Docket No: 10558-09
9 July 2010
application f£ 2 you ;
provisions of title 10 of the Unitea
O
y
5
™ Os
Fh
0
Kh
]
Hee ct
cr ;
j
za
q
D
to
(D
Records, ae ec 3 S$ 1'Or)
Sa A ccetcliome Ter ON Your all
application on 8 July 2010. ‘four als ; istrati
re J 4 = -qdance 1 T
| €4 ere reviewe mn accoraance 1 S
injustice were reviewec if cal a nner 2 ass
culations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of a
requlati 5 I iG eaures PE one a ee oe ee ke
Board Documentary material considered by the Boara cons iste oF
Nae! CA ob A Ne —— oe . : . 5 ' . te in support
four application, together with all aN da _ suppor
your appli (a a ease 7 regulations,
thereof, your naval record, and app g
and pol
I a
& ard watch at On = J 1 os
e d NgP for two instances of failing to go to your appointed
received NuI r two stanc : a oe
mlace of duty, and wrongful use of ma juana. ao 18 Septem
- , otor C +r a
1983, you received NIP for operating a motorcycie ee =
sarety rd, and breaking restriction. On 9 a 19:83
safety card, and breaking Test ion. On 9 September ove
administrative separation action was initiated by reason 0 am
7 a eine ; 74° a Vado 4 os
misconduct for drug abuse You waived your rights to consult
iL SCor#n C £ rug DUSe .
counsel, submit a statement or have your case heard by an
pe o - = 5s \ y wes : sen rl man
adm: istrative discharge board (ADB). Your commanding ertieer
el 1NIsbBllalsave ol ea - a
forws se ine recommendat ion that you be oh SSS d under other
arde , recomme 5 |
overall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board found that
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your discharge, given your record of three NUP's for
misconduct and drug abuse. The Board noted that you waived your
rights to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a more
favorable characterization of service. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board noted that you may be eligible for benefits with the
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) based on your first peried
of honorable service. You may wish to contact your local CLiice
of the DVA for a determination.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
LoSuees
W. DEAN PFRAF
Executive Dikrertor
\
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00581
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINql.AL). GRADEPERSONAL APPEARANCEx RECORDREVIEW ADORE$ ANDORORCANIZATIONOFCOUNS&L MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHERDENYISSUESA92.35INDEXNUMBER A66.00 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOfDISCHARGE3 LETIEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINCDATE CAS£NUM8ER...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR067 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2014 The names and votes of tne members of the panel will be furnished upon request your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together wit! Consequently, when...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0436
INDORSEMENT SAF/MIBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S: DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW. (EF-V2) EXHIBULS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 2 3. Attachment: Examiner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4903 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 July 1993 the discharge authority approved: this’ recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 16 July 1993 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00268
COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFH, M D 20762-7002 - Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW ROARD DECISIONAL RA'I'IONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-U0268 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, and to change the reenlistn~ent code. The characteri7ation of thc discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. I feel I desire a record review & have my DD 214 upgraded to honorable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3010 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consi your application, together with all material submitted in thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulati and policies After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence sul tted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable erial error or Ln uselce l You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active duty on 28 June 1968. New evidence is evidence not...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00333
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN- pe AB oe PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON ) “GEN 7 UOTHC OTHER DENY , x fr xX ii x ye x Qa: x ISSUES A93.1 9 INDEX NUMBER A67.1 0 - eS A92.37 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08643-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2002. On 6 October 1977 an ADB recommended an other than honorable discharge by reasion of misconduct due to civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.