Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08643-01
Original file (08643-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   OF  N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2   N A V Y   ANNEX 

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

TJR 
Docket No:  8643-01 
10 June 2002 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your 
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United 
States Code, Section 1552. 

A  three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval 
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 
application on 4 June 2002.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative 
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this 
Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board consisted of 
your application, together with all material submitted in support 
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, 
and policies. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire 
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient 
to establish the existence of probable material error or 
injustice. 

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 7 March  1974 at the age of 
18.  On 14 November 1974 you received nonjudicial punishment 
(NJP) for disobedience and disrespect.  The punishment imposed 
was a suspended $200 forfeiture of pay and restriction and extra 
duty fay 30 days. 

On 3 and 11 July 1975 you received NJP for a four day period of 
unauthorized absence  (UA) and breaking restriction  On 22 March 
1976 you received NJP for a 10 day period of UA.  The punishment 
imposed was reduction to paygrade E-2 and correctional custody 
for 30 days, both of which were suspended for six months. 

Your record reflects that on 6 May 1977 you were convicted by 
civil authorities of armed robbery and conspiracy to commit armed 
robbery.  You were sentenced to confinement for five to seven 
years, less 169 days of pre-trial confinement.  Subsequently, you 
were notified of pending administrative separation action by 
reason of misconduct due to civil conviction.  After consulting 
with legal counsel you elected to present your case to an 
administrative discharge board  (ADB).  On 6 October 1977 an ADB 

recommended an other than honorable discharge by reasion of 
misconduct due to civil conviction.  On 21 October  1977 your 
legal counsel submitted a written request for retention in the 
Marine Corps to complete your enlistment, if probation was 
granted by civil authorities.  However, this request was denied. 
On 28 October 1977 the discharge authority approved the 
recommendation of the ADB and directed discharge under other than 
honorable conditions.  On 3 November  1977, while in civil 
custody, you were so discharged. 

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, 
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating  factors, such as 
your youth and immaturity, and your contentions of drug and 
alcohol abuse, family problems,  racism, and that you now suffer 
from post traumatic stress disorder  (PTSD).  It also considered 
your contention of double jeopardy in that your civil conviction 
should have been  separate from your military  service. 
Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors and contentions 
were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your 
discharge given the serious nature of your misconduct  in both  the 
military and civilian communities.  Further, the Board noted that 
there is no evidence in the record, and you submitted none, to 
support your contentions.  Further, administrative processing for 
discharge due to civil conviction does not constitute double 
jeopardy.  Accordingly, your application has been denied. 

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished 
upon request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that 
favorable action cannot be taken.  You are entitled to have the 
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind  that a 
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval 
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the 
existence of probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03695-03

    Original file (03695-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2003. On 30 June 1959 an administrative discharge board (ADB) recommended that you be retained in the Marine Corps. When you were informed that administrative separation action had been initiated due to the civil conviction, you again elected to retain all of your procedural rights.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04580-01

    Original file (04580-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    statement from the American Legion in The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, support of your case, and your contention that you did not know The Board also that you had received an undesirable discharge. the Board concluded these factors and Concerning your contention of inadequate assistance of counsel, the Board noted that this Sixth Amendment right does not apply...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00327-01

    Original file (00327-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, during the seven month period from March 1973 to October 1973 you received four nonjudicial punishments ( N J P ) and were convicted by a summary court-martial. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06453-01

    Original file (06453-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the disciplinary action taken, paygrade E-l and a $50 forfeiture of However, the record does not reflect if any, for these periods of UA. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04968-01

    Original file (04968-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    contentions that you were punished twice for the same offense, thus becoming a victim of double-jeopardy, and that your martial conviction did not warrant an other than honorable Additionally, the Board considered your contention discharge. that your diagnosed schizophrenia was the cause of your periods The Board concluded these factors and contentions were of UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00360-01

    Original file (00360-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    evidence in available medical records that you were referred for psychiatric evaluation. On 26 August 1980 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) denied your request for recharacterization of your discharge. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of four NJPs and the serious nature of the charges of which you were convicted by civil authorities.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03204-09

    Original file (03204-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2010. Shortly thereafter, on 19 December 1973, you began another period of UA that was not terminated until you were apprehended by civil authorities and charged with armed robbery. On 6 March 1974, while in custody of civil authorities, you were you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to the civil conviction.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_17_36 CDT 2000

    Further, other individuals stated that you did not notify the command until the third duty day after the arrest. You contend that the arrest was reported on the first day back to work; you were directed not to have any contact with anyone on board the submarine, and therefore could not obtain any witnesses; the executive officer threatened further adverse action if you appealed the NJP; and you were told that you would receive additional alcohol rehabilitation prior to discharge. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01425-02

    Original file (01425-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05155-01

    Original file (05155-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. all the circumstances of your case, discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...