DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 09877-09
20 July 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction to your
deceased husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC
1552’.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
19 July 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In
addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the
Deputy Director Casualty Assistance Branch (N135C) memo of 25 Jun 10,
a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ee §
W. DEAN PF R
Executive tor
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10558-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2010. However, at no time prior to his death did he ever request to transfer to the Fleet Reserve in a retired status. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03610-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06861-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an , official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03996-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01194-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval records and ; applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04012-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12681-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05516-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your husband’s record on 10 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09990-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03815-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...