Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10558-08
Original file (10558-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

WJH
Doc. No. 10522-08
25 January 2010

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
deceased husband's record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC
1552. You requested the records be changed to show that he

. transferred to the Fleet Reserve in a retired status prior to

' his death in 2003.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 January 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your deceased husband's naval records, and the
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy
Personnel Command letter 7220 PERS 823 of 18 February 2009. A
copy of that letter was previously furnished to you and is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence
submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of
probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the
Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion.

The records show that in early May 2003, your husband was
serving on active duty in the United States Navy. On 14 May
2003, his deceased body was found at a residence in Las Vegas
Nevada. Accidental overdose of heroin and cocaine were
Doc. No. 10522-08

determined to be the cause and manner of his death. At the time
he died, your husband had served 20 years, 4 months and 22 days
on active duty. However, at no time prior to his death did he
ever request to transfer to the Fleet Reserve in a retired
status.

Title 10 US Code 6330 is the law that governs voluntary
transfers to the Fleet Reserve for enlisted personnel. That
law, and the regulations that implement the law, require that an
enlisted member who completes 20 or more years of active service
must make a request before he can be transferred to the Fleet
Reserve. Members, such as your husband, with more than 20 years
of active service who die without making such a request are
considered simply to have died while serving on active duty and
they are not transferred to the Fleet Reserve. Your husband was
afforded the same treatment as other personnel who are similarly
Situated to him. The Board found that under these
circumstances, insufficient evidence of an error or injustice
exists to warrant the change you seek. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new ’and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

We any i
Executive Witector

Bncelosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09433-08

    Original file (09433-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 2009. The Board found that you also certified on the DD 2656 that you were aware that your husband’s retired pay would stop when he dies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09029-10

    Original file (09029-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 29 December 2003, he executed a DD Form 2656 declining participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06363-08

    Original file (06363-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your © application on 20 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08329-00

    Original file (08329-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 17 July 2001 8329-00 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04012-10

    Original file (04012-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07253-10

    Original file (07253-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under these circumstances, the Board found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant any change to your husband’s RCSBP election. Under this option, if the retiree dies before reaching age 60, a survivor annuity is payable on the date the member would have attained age 60. Option C - Immediate annuity.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10798-09

    Original file (10798-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your application seeks a change to your - deceased former husband's records to entitle you to benefits under the Survivor Benefit, Plan (SBP) . Upon his transfer, - he elected enrollment in the SBP in the “spouse” category of coverage. Upon his death, Linda became the SBP annuitant of record based on her status as the “spouse beneficiary.” You have, understandably, petitioned this Board to change the: record to show that you are entitled to a portion of your former husband's Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03267-06

    Original file (03267-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted that, although he was eligible, your deceased husband had never enrolled in the Reserve component Survivor Benefit Plan after becoming eligible for retirement (without pay). They found that he had received ample opportunity to request retired pay and enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan during the almost 14 years between 8 April 1991 to 18 January 2005. was eligible for retired pay on 8 April 1991.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05749-01

    Original file (05749-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Roartl. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this willt your application, together naval record and applicable the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02316-06

    Original file (02316-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-000023 Aug 06 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDSVia: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-3lC) Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his current spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). XXXXXcould have enrolled his current spouse in the SBP during the 1 October 1981 to 30 September 1982 or 1 April 1992 to 31 March 1993...