Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03294-09
Original file (03294-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

i

 

LCC
Docket No. 3294-09
13 Jul og

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

13 July 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice Were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum MMPR-2 of
8 June 2009, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

la.

W. DEAN PFEI
Executive Di

  
 

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5104 IN REPLY REFER TO:

 

1400/3
MMPR-2

"JUN 98 2009

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

 

Subj: ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE CO}, fiiiainiiamiaggll
DiS. USMC (RETIRED)

 

Ref: {a} BCNR Docket Number 3294-09 of 23 Apr 09
{b) NAVMC 118(5) from SNM’s service record book
(c) SNM’s DD Form 214 of 30 Nov 1954
(d) Marine Corps Rank Structure prior to & after 1946
{e} Marine Corps Rank Structure 1954 / 1959 / 1960
(£) SNM’s TFDW Report of 93 Jun 09

1. Per reference (a) WQQMMBMMMe asserts his record should reflect the
rank of sergeant vice corporal.

2. References (b}) and (c) verify that Shine was last promoted to
the rank of sergeant (E-4) with a date of rank and effective date of 1
March 1952 prior to his transfer to the permanent physical disability
list. References (d) and (e) document the changes in the Marine Corps
rank structure between 1 December 1946 and 1 August 2960. Specifically,
in 1952, a Marine sergeant held the pay grade of E-4. After 1 August
1960, a Marine sergeant held the pay grade of E-5.

3. Based on the information above, =—QIGRWMNNMRe assertion is correct,
his record should reflect the rank of sergeant but his pay grade should

reflect E-4. Furthermore, reference (f) also verifies that #i
pay grade is E-4 not E-5.

  
  

  

ere

  

4. Based on the foregoing, it is recommended iii
unchanged.

Merecord remain

  

Major, U. S. Marine Corps

Head, Enlisted Promotion Section

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01498-09

    Original file (01498-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    01498-09 25 August 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USc 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10157-08

    Original file (10157-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum MMPR-2 1400/3 of 27 February 2009, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09

    Original file (06987-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02755-09

    Original file (02755-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) states the requirements for promotion to the rank of corporal were as follows: (1) Complete the minimum time in grade/time in service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05874-07

    Original file (05874-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 13 August 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05759-07

    Original file (05759-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Based on the information above, passing the GMST is only one of the qualifying factors for a Marine to be promoted to the rank of staff sergeant. Furthermore, reference (b) also verifies that became qualified for promotion to staff sergeant on 28 December 1954.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11861-10

    Original file (11861-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    11861-09 8 November 2010 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC L552... A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2010. "” There is no evidence that you were or should have been discharged as a Sergeant. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05091-08

    Original file (05091-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01192-08

    Original file (01192-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC memo 1400/3 MMPR-2 of 21 Jul 08, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 05285-04

    Original file (05285-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5285-04 11 August 2004This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...