Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06475-09
Original file (06475-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

TAL
Docket No: 6475-09
8 April 2010

 

This is in.reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552. .

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 31 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on

26 November 2002 at age 18. On 9 December 2002 you were the
subject of a mental health evaluation. You were referred by the
Chaplain, for disclosing thoughts of hurting yourself or others.
During your evaluation it was stated, in part, that you drank
alcoholic beverages except hard liquor. You stated that you
started drinking a six pack of beer a week at age 16, then
increased from six to eight beers a day for the previous six
months. You were subsequently diagnosed as. alcohol dependent and
with borderline personality disorder. On 11 December 2002, you
were notified of pending administrative separation action due to
erroneous enlistment as evidenced by alcohol dependence. On 12
December 2002, your commanding officer directed that you be
discharged with an entry level separation. You were so
discharged on 17 December 2002. At that time you were assigned
an RE-4 reenlistment code.

The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
overall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board found that
these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your
narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code given your
diagnosis of alcohol dependence. An RE-4 reenlistment code is
routinely assigned under such circumstances. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\sSson.ยง

W. DEAN PF
Executive D or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07251-98

    Original file (07251-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    thereafter, on 7 March 1990, you refused further treatment and denied any need for further help with your drug and alcohol dependency. On 28 March 1990 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. 1990 your commanding officer recommended you be separated by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07023-01

    Original file (07023-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. However, regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged because of a diagnosed personality disorder. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07739-00

    Original file (07739-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code since you were given the most favorable code The Board noted your contention that authorized by regulation. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03274-02

    Original file (03274-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In your application you are requesting recharacterization of your discharge to honorable, a change in the reason for discharge and an RE-1 reenlistment code. He has no alcohol problems. Therefore, the Board found the evaluation was insufficient to overcome the diagnoses of alcohol dependence made prior to referral for alcohol rehabilitation, When you completed the inpatient rehabilitation program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07727-11

    Original file (07727-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considere@a your -application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01944-07

    Original file (01944-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 3 October 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 4 March 1991, you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03279-01

    Original file (03279-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at age 22. Based on the foregoing record, administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a and alcohol abuse rehabilitation designated mental condition, Subsequently, the separation authority directed an failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01541-01

    Original file (01541-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. must receive a fully honorable characterization of service in order to receive benefits. Based on the foregoing, you are neither eligible to receive basic educational benefits nor are you eligible to receive a refund of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-00

    Original file (05739-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In connection with this processing, On 13 July 1999 the In your application you are requesting that your general discharge be recharacterized to honorable and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00739-09

    Original file (00739-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 17 November 2003 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the Navy with a discharge under other than honorable conditions...