DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100
TOR
Docket No: 2264-10
17 March 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 March 2010. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this’ Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the
Board considered the Transmittal of and/or Entitlement to Awards
document (NAVPERS 1650/96) dated 2 October 2009 furnished by the
Navy Personnel Command, Retired Records Section (PERS-312);, a
copy of which is attached.
error or injustice.
Your record reflects that during the period from 20 July 1967 to
30 September 1970 you honorably served for a total of 3 years, 2
months, and 11 days. As such you did not meet the criteria
required for award of a Good Conduct Medal. In this regard,
during the period in which you served, a Sailor had to honorably
serve for four continuous years on active duty to be awarded a
Good Conduct Medal. Finally, the Board further considered your
request to have your Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty (DD Form 214) amended to reflect the award of the
Navy “E” Ribbon based on the administrative remarks entry dated 1
September 1969. However, the Board noted that you should contact
the Department of the Navy, Navy Personnel Command (BUPERS),
Sailor Assistance Center, Code Pers-312F, 5720 Integrity Drive,
Millington, TN 38055-3120 to request administrative corrections,
such as this, to be made on your DD Form 214.
\
In regards to the foregoing, the Board substantially concurred
with the comments contained in the NAVPERS 1650/96 document.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
présumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFE
Executive D or
Bnclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05639-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11858-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2011. The Board was unable to find that your circumstances prevented you from availing yourself of your opportunities to defend yourself or pursue redress regarding the contested performance evaluation reports. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR833 14
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06774-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC 1430 Ser 4SllAl/600, 6 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01650-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2010. You elected to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which met and found that you had committed misconduct (commission of a serious offense), but recommended that you receive a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00530-01
In this connection, the Board substantially The Board will reconsider your request for the Air Medal if the 1650/3 and plane commander completes the attached OPNAV Form submits it to the Board of Decorations and Medals. Regulations that govern submission of an official recommendation require that the recommendation be signed by an "officer senior to the person being recommended. 20350-2000 NAV Y N S IN REPLY REFER TO 09B13/1U518366 Ser 29 August 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chief of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04750-07
04750-07 9 June 2008Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08073-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. request comments and recommendations in Specifically, petitioner requests increase Per reference (b), only those personnel who are transferred 2. to the Fleet Reserve are accorded the increase of retainer pay for Extraordinary Heroism. Assistant Officer Retirements Branch Head, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08237-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08237-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...