DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ;
JR]
Docket No. 05039-09
17 September 2010
Gd
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16
September 2010. After careful consideration of your application,
the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and
that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure
to submit your application in a timely manner.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must
include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably
available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence
May pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application
is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
Lo Naud
W. DEAN PF
Executive DY¥re
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00247-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2010. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05723-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2010. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. In addition, it found that you failed to submit any evidence which is probative of your contention to the effect...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02505-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2011. In an effort to ascertain whether you would have advanced or not from the September 2010 cycle (if you had taken the MME exam), the raw exam score that you achieved on the March 2011 MME exam was applied to the remainder of your profile For the September 2010 cycle. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00401-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an efficial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05646-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2010. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00278-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07323-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. 07323-09 17 September 2010 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11272 11
g. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had never been held back in any way from progressing through his Navy career due to security clearance issues and he was not aware that there was a deficiency that would disqualify him from competing for advancement. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11228-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 08179-11
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On two occasions, 19 September 1996, and 19 November 2007, you signed and acknowledged the Navy’s policy concerning sexual harassment. commanding officer submitted a request for detachment for cause by reason of sexual harassment, which you were allotted sufficient time to respond.