DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .
CRS
Docket No: 1315-09
7 duly 2009
This ig in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered, your
application on 24 June 29009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 16 September
1991. On 11 October 1991 you received an entry level separation
by reason of fraudulent entry due to your concealment of a
history of shin splits.
The Board did not accept your unsubstantiated contention that you
informed the recruiter of your shin splits and that he told you
not to worry about it. The Board was not persuaded that you were
discharged in error, or that it would be in the interest of
justice to change the basis of your discharge. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10149-07
rientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. VY ile OLliit Pain, m successfully completing the physical condition was disabling, or that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03548-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 1 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07810-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 24 August 1992 at age 21. On 14 January 1993 you were separated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08339-00
documentation to support separation processing, is not filed in your service record. it has been determined that additional You The Board's regulations state that there is a "presumption of regularity to support the official actions of public officers, and in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, will presume that they properly discharged their official duties." 2 Further in a 1998 decision, Claims, in an Army Board for Correction of Military Records case, upheld the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04601-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application.on 22 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02974-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2011. That you no longer suffer from chronic tibial pain does not demonstrate that you were discharged in error, or provide a basis for amending your reentry code, which is the most favorable code that you could have received as a Sailor being discharged by reason of physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10013-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 10013-07 26 June 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMERS we gene REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of either an RE-3E or RE-4 reentry code to an individual separated for erroneous enlistment. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06721-00
t for the period 960914 to 970710 (TR) was Removal of Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive requested. evidenced in the final paragraph of enclosure (6) to reference REPORTING SENIORS HERE WILL BE (a) (i.e., "FITNESS REPORTS. THE FITNESS REPORTS.").
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09322-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 7 September 1990, you enlisted in the Naval Reserve at age18. On 5 February 1991, you were so...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08422-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2] June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...