DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
Lec
Docket No.678-09
26 May 09 ©
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
26 May 2009. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 4050.1D LPC-4-WC of
27 February 2009, a: copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied, The names and votes of the»members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitied to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter net previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Deas
Executive Direst
Enclosure
\
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON, DC 20380-1775 IN REPLY REFER TO:
4050.1D
LPC-4-WC
27 Feb 2009
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: PETITION OF ®
Ref: {a} Joint Federal Travel Regulations
1. Mi was counseled by personnel at the
Personal Property Shipping Office ({PPSO) at Marine Corps
Air Station Beaufort, South Carolina, “After reviewing the
documentation, it is clear that sigieiiiillllllliiliiage requested
shipment and subsequent storage in transit during his
' personal property counseling.
2. During the traffic management briefing and booking of
shipment a member is counseled as to their benefits and
particulars of their move to include the choice between
storage in transit (SIT) versus non-temporary storage
(NTS).
3. The Marine’s signature on the DD Form 1299 and DD Form
1787 both dated 23 January 2008 is proof that the Marine
was briefed and requested the storage in transit option.
The counselor’s notes and the Marine’s own emails serve to
verify this fact.
4. This Headquarters has determined that i ee
properly counseled and the delivery of his household goods
into the storage in transit facility is correct and we are
unable to recommend a favorable determination of this case.
CARL M. MARCHETTI
By direction
Attachments: Contents of MCAS Beaufort PPSO files
to include DD Form 1299 and DD Form 1787
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011724
As he was authorized to ship 18,000 lbs of HHG, he exceeded his authorized weight by 6,700 lbs and incurred a debt of $8,183.18. The PPSO must request a reweigh for shipments exceeding the JFTR weight allowance. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was properly notified on 24 September 2010, when his HHG were picked up from his residence in Virginia, that his HHG had a total net weight of 28,680 lbs.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07331-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your applicable statutes, opinion furnished by which is attached. M LFT 3 WC of 19 October 2001, a copy of I tll administrative regulations and procedures applicable the Board considered the advisory application, together III addition, with all After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021629
She claims she requested the shipment of her NTS goods from Virginia to Guam and she was informed by Guam transportation personnel she was required to pay for the shipment of her HHG because based on her orders, the expiration of her shipping entitlement was in April 2009. Notwithstanding the advisory opinion, it would be appropriate to correct her record to show she was granted an exception to policy and her NTS expiration date was in fact 30 September 2009; and by reimbursing her the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005118
The applicant states the reason for her request for extension of the HHG SIT termination date was due to medical reasons. In her 4-page self-authored statement, the applicant lists 28 events/items that are summarized, as follows: * she divorced in April 2013 * after disclosing that she had been sexually assaulted and then reporting a sexual assault on her 8-year-old son, she was assigned to the Community Based Warrior Transition Unit-Massachusetts (CBWTU-MA) * the reassignment was to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01713
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends approval. Should the board agree, the record should be changed to reflect the applicant's property was released from storage in transit on 5 August 2013, and the debt for NTS after the one year time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019550
The applicant states that when he filled out his DD Form 1299 (Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property) he requested a delivery date of 19 September 2014 and he subsequently received an email saying that his no-cost temporary storage would expire on 20 September 2014. Notwithstanding the advisory opinion from the G-4 which opines that the applicant could have accepted the earliest delivery date of 8 September but chose not to do so because of personal convenience, it is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05924
On 17 March 2011, the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office Northeast (JPPSO-NE) notified the applicant that his request for an extension was granted until 9 July 2011, a total of 180 days, and that any additional storage time past this date may not be authorized. On 15 June 2011, the applicant was advised that his HHG shipment from Florida in storage at government expense will expire/convert on 9 July 2011. On 17 June 2011, AFPC/DPSIAR notified the applicant and JPPSO-NE that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05924
On 17 March 2011, the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office Northeast (JPPSO-NE) notified the applicant that his request for an extension was granted until 9 July 2011, a total of 180 days, and that any additional storage time past this date may not be authorized. On 15 June 2011, the applicant was advised that his HHG shipment from Florida in storage at government expense will expire/convert on 9 July 2011. On 17 June 2011, AFPC/DPSIAR notified the applicant and JPPSO-NE that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007243
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). An Application for Shipment and/or Storage of Personal Property, dated 8 January 2007, shows in item 10 (Destination Information) that the applicant elected to ship his HHG to Dallas, Texas. In response to the request for reimbursement of the cost of shipping his HHGs from Texas to Arizona, the DA G-4 authorized a partial payment to the applicant of $1,175.33, which was the maximum cost that would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002823
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was authorized an extension of non-temporary storage (NTS) of his household goods (HHG) at government expense (in effect, remission of his NTS debt). The evidence of record shows the applicant separated from active duty on 31 May 2010 and his discharge orders indicate he was authorized movement of his HHG at government expense up to 180 days subsequent to his ETS date. The governing regulation states the authority for HHG...