Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11813-08
Original file (11813-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE

Docket No. 11813-08
1 April 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552. You requested correction of
your record to show that you sustained a wound to your on 8 May
1942, and that you were awarded the Purple Heart. You contend
that you found no report of the wound in your naval record,
which you “just acquired”.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 March 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, it concluded that your
personal statement is insufficient to demonstrate that on 8 May
1942, you were wounded under circumstances that would entitle
you to the Purple Heart. The Board noted that you should have
been aware of the alleged deficiency in your record in 1986,
when you applied to the Veterans Administration for service
connection for injuries to your knee, arm, head and eye
sustained in 1942.

The Board also concluded that a claim for reimbursement of the
value of property lost or damaged in 1942 is not timely, and
would not be accepted by claims adjudicating authorities.

In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished

upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

«

EAN PF R
Executive or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03364-98

    Original file (03364-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. or agent sustained as a In reaching its decision the Board noted that the Purple Heart was not authorized for issuance to the Navy until 3 December 1942 and there is no evidence that you applied for the Purple...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05914-06

    Original file (05914-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, you did not submit a claim to the Veterans Administration for residuals of wounds,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07371-09

    Original file (07371-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 20 August 2009. In this regard, the Board carefully considered your contentions and the statements you submitted in support of your application, but found those matters insufficient to demonstrate that you were wounded in 1944 under circumstances that would entitle you to the Purple Heart. Consequently, when applying.for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07440-00

    Original file (07440-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 S CRS Docket No: 7440-00 5 December 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 30 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. Naval Operations has reviewed subject man's case for eligibility determination for the Purple...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05505-09

    Original file (05505-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted © of your application, together with.all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06007-00

    Original file (06007-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 27 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 9 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07975-08

    Original file (07975-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05157-99

    Original file (05157-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2000. Documentary ‘material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were wounded in action on 26 December 1968, and awarded the Purple Heart on 5 January 1969.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08148-02

    Original file (08148-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY I BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JRE Docket No. 08148-02 6 Mav 2003 This is in reference to your application for corr, naval record pursuant to the provisions of title United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction \)f Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2003.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08086-09

    Original file (08086-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2010. The statements of your former commanding officer and a former member of your platoon were carefully considered, but found insufficient to establish that you were knocked unconscious and sustained damage to your ears and hearing as @ result of a mortar blast, as neither was an eyewitness to your alleged wounding. Consequently, when applying for a...