Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06007-00
Original file (06007-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

CRS
Docket No 6007-00
27 June 2001

 

Co Rca

This is in reference to your application reconsideration for
correction of your late father’s naval record pursuant to the
provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your
application on 27 June 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory

opion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 9 April
2001, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

. Enclosure
)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

IN REPLY REFER TO

 

Ser 09B13/1U516079
9 April 2001

From: Chief of Naval Operations (N09B13)
To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj : “ions FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF
4
«

Encl: (1) BCNR File
(2) Service Record
(3) Combat Action Ribbon

1. Enclosures (1) and (2) are returned. Mrs. Ls
requesting a Purple Heart for her late father, : for
injury to his ankle when the USS HOUSTON sank in 1942 and his subsequent
internment in Japanese war camps.

2. Because of the requirement that the injury sustained must be the direct
result of enemy action (inflicted upon by the enemy), sworn eyewitness
statements to the injury are accepted for review in the lack of medical
documentation. These statements must clearly show the injury was witnessed,
when and how it occurred, and the extent of the injury.

3. A thorough review of MQQMAQMBNNF! military record was made by all cognizant
sources, in addition to all of \—.-—_—_MBMNWS? earlier and subsequent
documentation, and failed to provide the required affidavits or show that her
father was wounded or injured under conditions that authorize the Purple
Heart. The affidavit | SRR clematis is a general statement of his
personal experience while a prisoner of war and not a statement attesting to
witnessing personal harm inflicted to a particular prisoner.

4. While the requirements for enemy action, medical record verification
and/or clear-cut verification of eyewitnesses may seem stringent, we consider

it essential to maintaining the integrity of this important decoration. The
Purple Heart is not awarded solely for being a prisoner of war.

5. In view of the above, we regret the Purple Heart may not be awarded at
this time. However, in accordance with Public Law 106-65, we were able to
review Mr. meligibility for the retroactive Combat Action Ribbon.
Enclosure (3) is forwarded for delivery to the next of kin.

  

nd Special Projects

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07440-00

    Original file (07440-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 S CRS Docket No: 7440-00 5 December 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 30 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. Naval Operations has reviewed subject man's case for eligibility determination for the Purple...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03551-00

    Original file (03551-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 3551-00 25 September 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction-of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. considered your application on 25 Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, September...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00549-01

    Original file (00549-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02997-01

    Original file (02997-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO dated 27 December 200 which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board 1, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting approval of your request to award you the Purple Heart Medal. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 IN REPLY REFER T...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00797-03

    Original file (00797-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01431-02

    Original file (01431-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals reviewed Mr. -petition for a Purple Heart.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-01

    Original file (06639-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Copies of these replies are forwarded as Enclosure (3) is a copy of a letter forwarded 1993 regarding his entitlement to (1) and (2) _ During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple Heart 2. was authorized for award to those who were wounded or injured as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United States or an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United States was engaged. and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02375

    Original file (BC 2014 02375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records provided by the applicant indicate the following. The applicant’s request was not boarded by the Purple Heart Review Board as it does not contain a detailed personal account, supporting eyewitness statements or medical documentation showing an injury incurred by enemy action. After a thorough review of the applicant’s limited official military personnel record, they were able to verify award of the European African Middle Eastern Campaign Medal, the World War...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01108-00

    Original file (01108-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0 S -_ IN...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003104

    Original file (0003104.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: As a tail gunner in a B-24 Bomber during World War II, his plane was gunned down by the Germans. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Recognition Programs Branch, AFPC/DPPPR, indicates that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action. THOMAS C. MARKIEWICZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03104 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF...