Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08086-09
Original file (08086-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE
Docket No. ogos6-09

8 June 2010

 

 

This ig in reference to your request for further consideration
of your application for correction of your naval record to show
that you sustained a ruptured eardrum in combat in 1966, and
your related request that you be awarded the Purple Heart for

that injury.

- R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 June 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Boarg. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that rhe evidence submitted was

error or injustice.

Your receipt of disability ratings from the Department of
veterans Affairs for tinnitus (10%) and hearing loss (0%) does
not establish that you sustained a significant aural injury
while serving in combat in 1966. The statements of your former
commanding officer and a former member of your platoon were
carefully considered, but found insufficient to establish that
you were knocked unconscious and sustained damage to your ears
and hearing as @ result of a mortar blast, as neither was an

eyewitness to your alleged wounding. There is no evidence in
your naval heaith record that you sustained a wound or injury in
combat that required treatment by a medical officer. Such
treatment is one of the major criteria for the award of the
Purple Heart. The Board questioned the accuracy of your
contention that you were knocked unconscious by the mortar
blast, as you completed a report of medical history on 9
December 1970 in which you denied having a history of
unconsciousness, concussion, ear trouble, and head injury.

In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished

upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
W. DEAN FER
Executive ctor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08785-08

    Original file (08785-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 10 September 2008. A pre-printed medical form that was completed on that date contains the printed words “Wounded in action”, as well as the typewritten words “HEAT EXHAUSTION”. The pre-printed medical record entry dated 18 September 1944 is of no probative value, as a typewritten entry was added to the form to show that you were suffering from heat exhaustion,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009496

    Original file (20100009496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He indicated at the time that he had been near three mortar attacks since 12 April and that he had not taken any medications. However, on 26 January 2009, HRC-Alexandria returned the request for award of the Purple Heart to the applicant without action due to the lack of necessary supporting documentation. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100329C070208

    Original file (04100329C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that during a firefight with enemy forces in Vietnam he sustained a blast injury to his right ear, a burn to the right side of his face, and was knocked unconscious. This ruling, in effect, granted the service Secretaries the authority to award the Purple Heart to individuals directly engaged in armed conflict who were killed or wounded as a result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019637

    Original file (20110019637.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's WD AGO Form 55 (Army of the United States Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant requests the FSM's service record be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. posthumously awarding the FSM the: * Purple Heart for injuries sustained in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001556

    Original file (20150001556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant stated in his previous application: a. His records contain: a. He described these injuries as "superficial" and stated he believed the injuries may have been cause by shrapnel from the explosion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017379

    Original file (20080017379.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080017379 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s service medical records are not available; the only available service medical document is the SF 513 provided by the applicant. In the absence of a completed, authenticated, and verified Casualty Feeder Report or other evidence which clearly shows the applicant suffered a wound or injury as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for this wound or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9903198

    Original file (9903198.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03198 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for injury sustained in . A complete copy of the advisory opinion is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009247

    Original file (20080009247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 15 March 2006 DD Form 214 by adding the Combat Action Badge, and by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053875C070420

    Original file (2001053875C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her deceased father’s, the former service member (FSM), previous application to correct his military records by awarding him the Purple Heart. The applicant’s submission is new evidence that requires Board consideration. The physician conducting the FSM’s separation physical examination, who must have access to his service medical records, apparently did not question that the applicant had been rendered unconscious by a shell blast.