Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00685-07
Original file (00685-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                  DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
         BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



HD: hd
Docket No. 00685-07
14 January 2008
                   ___      __







This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested promotion to chief warrant officer (CWO)4 effective 1 October 2006 or, if that request is not approved, reversion to permanent limited duty officer (LDO) lieutenant and retirement in that grade.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 January 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory o pinio n furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 16 April and 23 August 2007, copies of which are attached. The Board also considered your letter of 22 May 2007.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Although the Board does have the power to consider correcting your record to show your promotion to CWO4 when you have not actually been selected by a promotion board, it was unable to find you were not properly presented to the Fiscal Year 07 CWO4 Selection Board in the status of above zone not previously considered. The Board found it would not be
 erroneous or unjust if your retirement were a factor in your failure of selection. Regarding your alternative request, the Board particularly noted that your status was previously changed from permanent to temporary LDO lieutenant, so that you could retain your permanent status as a CWO3, by direction of the Board in response to your request. The Board found your not having been selected for promotion to CW04 did not justify reversing its previous action. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.



It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosures


























DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000


 5420
PERS-480/ 02 09
16 Apr 07
MEMORANDUM FOR   EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31c)
Subj:    REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF

Ref:     (a) Board for Corrections of Naval Records ltr dtd 13 Mar 06
 (b)      Title 10, United States Code
End:     (1) BCNR File 00685—07
1 Enclosure (1) is returned recommending request to receive a back dated promotion to CWO4 be disapproved.
2 ~ was accurately and fairly consider the FY-07 Active Duty CWO4 Selection Board as an above zone not previously considered eligible as directed by reference (a) . Unfortunately, he was not selected for promotion to the next higher grade.
3.       Furthermore, there is no provision in reference be promoted without the recommendation of a promotion selection board.

retire on 01 October 2007 and should be
 justifiably proud of his 30 years of Naval service. Recommend disapproval of his request for promotion.


Di rec tor , Officer Career Progression Branch
(PERS -480)






DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000


 5420
 PERS—480 /07 62
23 Aug 07

MEMORANDUM FOR   EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-3lC)
Subj:    REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CASE OF

Ref:     (a) Board for Corrections of Naval Records ltr dtd 13 Mar 06
 (b)      Title 10, United States Code
End:     (1) BCNR File 00685—07
1 Enclosure (1) is returned ~ request to receive a back dated promotion to CWO4 and reversion to permanent pay grade of 03E be disapproved.
2.       In accordance with reference (a) and original request; his naval record was corrected to show temporary appointment as an LDO Lieutenant vice permanent. Therefore, naval record is correct and requires no further modifications.
          record was accurately and fairly considered by the FY-07 Active Duty CWO4 Selection Board as an above zone not considered eligible as directed by reference ~ not selected for promotion to the next higher grade and there is no provision in reference (b) for be promoted without the recommendation of a promotion selection board.

retire on 01 October 2007 and should be proud
 of his 30 years of Naval service. Recommend disapproval of his request for promotion and reversion.



Director, Officer Career Progression Department
(PERS-80)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09248-06

    Original file (09248-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was promoted to commander at the 16 year point and was within the flow point guidelines.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07367-06

    Original file (07367-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board also considered your letter dated 16 January 2007.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence Of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, the member’s record was reviewed and he was selected for promotion to the grade of Lieutenant Commander, with this report in his record. h. If directed by the Board for Correction of Naval Records, PERS-3 11 will accept a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02010-06

    Original file (02010-06.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00292-07

    Original file (00292-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested that your lieutenant commander date of rank and effective date be adjusted to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 06 Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer Lieutenant Commander Selection Board, vice FY 07.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 February 2007 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07117-00

    Original file (07117-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. as a Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve since the date of his commission and therefore was never eligible for a date of rank adjustment. e Active Status List erved continuously activ Reserve...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04456-00

    Original file (04456-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (MSC) Captain Selection Boards; special selection board Naval Reserve MSC Captain Selection Board, by which you You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 through 2003 Medical Service consideration for the FY 2000 were not considered; and amendment of the remedial memorandum now in your naval record, stating you have served on active duty continuously since your discharge from the Regular Navy on 31 January 1990, to show you are “USN” (United...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07335-00

    Original file (07335-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fitness reports in question are valid reports. c. The member may request the reporting senior to submit a Fitness Report Letter Supplement or Supplemental Fitness Report to reflect the changes the member requested. selection board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10951-07

    Original file (10951-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You also impliedly requested setting aside your discharge from the Navy Reserve on 1 February 2008 by reason of your having had at least two failures of selection to lieutenant commander.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05819-06

    Original file (05819-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member’s statement and the reporting senior’s endorsement are both included in the member’s record. In this case, the reporting senior assigned the member a promotion recommendation of “Promotable,” which in no way equates to deficient performance. Concur with comments and recommendations found in reference (a)2 After examinationDD Form 149, we find no request that is actionable by PERS-480does not request that her failures of selection be removed nor does she request a special...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03638-02

    Original file (03638-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    following comments and recommendation concerning request that her date of transfer to Standby Reserve-Inactive (USNR-S2) status be changed from 31 August 2000 to 1997 and all failures of selection that date be removed. After her release from active duty, she entered the Individual Ready Reserve the Naval Reserve. Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, regardless of their active participation.