Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10519-08
Original file (10519-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

WIJH
Docket No. 10519-08
4 December 2008

 

Dear 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10496-06

    Original file (10496-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 May 1967. The court sentenced you to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09003-06

    Original file (09003-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complainant alleges that:(1) On September 22, 2005, respondent improperly vacated suspension of complainant’s earlier nonjudicial punishment. He therefore denied complainant’s request for relief as to the vacation proceedings.SUBJECT: Complaint of Wrongs Under Article 138, UCMJ, ICO• With respect to complainant’s request for admiral’s mast, the GCMA determined that the request should not have been denied at the command level. The investigating office concluded that complainant had violated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05659-08

    Original file (05659-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 5659-08 26 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: <

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08130-08

    Original file (08130-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A special court-martial convened on 26 February 1965 and convicted you of two periods of unauthorized absence totaling about 140 days and conduct...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0177

    Original file (FD2002-0177.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDIN.E ENITIAL) “ GRADE AFSN/SSAN ” AB tee = 7 - . CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 1'1902-0177 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Major eh recommended that Senior Airman be fesued an under other than honorable conditions discharge without suspension for probation and rehabilitation (P & R)- After consulting legal counsel, Senior Airman QQ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06118-08

    Original file (06118-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 7 June 1966 the command recommended you for an undesirable discharge due to the civil conviction but also recommended that the discharge be...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00214

    Original file (FD2005-00214.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s and a Vacation action under the UCMJ for making a false official statement, writing bad checks, and wrongfully leaving the scene of an accident. In addition, he received two Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling and one Memorandum for Record for various acts of misconduct to include financial irresponsibility, dereliction of duty, being late for duty and falsifying an official government document. The DRB noted that when...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00402

    Original file (FD2005-00402.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, ~ l l 2 1 1 7 6 2 - ~ U U Z AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00402 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. b. Grade Status: AB - 18 Jun 01 (Vacation, 12 Jul 01) A1C - 14 May 99 Amn - 14 Jul 98 c. Time Lost: 30 Jul 00 - 10 Aug 00 (12 days) d. Art 15's: (1) 12 Jul 01, Vacation, Spangdahlem AB, GE - Article 92. (Change Discharge to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04589-08

    Original file (04589-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0186

    Original file (FD2002-0186.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | xp 002-0186 GENERAL; The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. An honorable discharge would be appropriate when the member's service generally has met Air Force standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty or when a member’s service has been so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons sct forth above, I recommend the respondent...