AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
--
-
- -
TYPE GEN K-[r PERSONAL APPEARANCE
NAME O F COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
'OUNSEL
- -'IITIAL)
-
GRADE
AMN
I
I
RECORD REVIEW
X
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
VOTE OF THE BOARD
HON
GEN
UOTHC
OTHER
DENY
I
I
I
I
-
ISSUES A94.05
A93.09
INDEX NUMBER
A67.90
3 . ,
a t
1 I
, i
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO TWE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTWG THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
1
2
3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
1
1
1 HEARING DATE
29 Dee 2005
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THEBOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
I
1 CASENUMBER
1 FD-2005-00214
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
I
I slGNATURE o-nnnr-
I , INDORSEMENT
SAFMRBR 1 SECRETARY O F THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING. 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
DATE: 12/29/2005
n v a n a ~ n P D F C ~ ~ F A T
I E.~-w*-F
FROM:
I
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUhlBER
FD-2005-00214
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to exercise
this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
7 Ihe Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the applicant
received two Article 15s and a Vacation action under the UCMJ for making a false official statement, writing bad
checks, and wrongfully leaving the scene of an accident. In addition, he received two Letters of Reprimand, one Letter
of Counseling and one Memorandum for Record for various acts of misconduct to include financial irresponsibility,
dereliction of duty, being late for duty and falsifying an official government document. The DRB opined that through
these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board
concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The
characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Applicant states that his
discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The DRB took note of the applicant's
duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments.
They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance.
The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case. The applicant
also submitted his post-service activities. The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a
good job. However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing.
The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service. The applicant
cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant
applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366) that he understood he must receive an Honorable
discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these
benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an
upgrade. Finally, the applicant stated that he was told his discharge would be automatically upgraded after 6 months.
The DRB noted the issue was common, the result of miscommunication. While a discharge may be upgraded after six
months, the upgrade is by no means automatic. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the DRB can
establish an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. In this case, none was found, so the Board
denied the appeal.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that
the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade
of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH SRA)
MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Tinker AFB, OK on 05 Sep 99
UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good
Order and ~iscipline) . ~ppeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 10 NQV 74. Enlmt Age: 17 8/12. Disch Age: 24 9/12. Educ: HS DIPL
AFQT: N/A. A-82, E-69, G-70, M-76. PAFSC: 3N052 - Radio and Television
Broadcasting Journeyman. DAS: 22 Nov 96.
b. prior Sv: (1) AFRes 29 Jul 92 - 01 Dec 92 (4 months 3 days) (Inactive).
for 1 month. Svd: 3 yrs 1 month 19 days, all AMS. AMN - 02 Jun 93. A1C - 02
Apr 94. SrA - 02 Dec 95. EPRs: 4,5,5.
(2) Enlisted as AB 02 Dec 92 for 4 yrs. Extended 04 Aug 94
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenlisted as SrA 22 Jan 96 for 4 yrs. Svd: 03 Yrs 07 Mo 14 Das, all
AMS .
b. Grade Status: Amn - 23 Jun 99 (Article 15, 23 Jun 99)
A1C - 04 Jun 99 (Vacation of Article 15, 04 Jun 99)
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 23 Jun 99, SHAPE, Belguim - Article 134. You, were,
the driver of a vehicle at the time of an accident in
which said vehicle was involved, and having knowledge of
said accident, did, at or near Mons, Belgium, on or
about 18 Oct 98, wrongfully leave the scene of the
accident without making your identity known. Reduction
to Airman, and restriction to the limits of SHAPE
compound, Mons, Belgium for 60 days. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
(2) 04 Jun 99, Vacation, SHAPE, Belguim - Article 134. You
did, at Shape, Belgium, on divers occasions between on
or about 5 Feb 99 to on or about 12 Mar 99, make and
utter to Benelux Finance Office, Disbursing Office
certain checks, in words and figures as follows, to wit:
nine hundred twenty five dollars, in US currency, for
the purpose of cashing six personel checks, and did
thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain sufficient
funds in the Navy Federal Credit Union for payment of
such checks in full upon its presentment for payment.
Reduction to AlC. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
(3) 14 Dec 98, SHAPE, Belguim - Article 107. You, did, at
Shape, Belgium, on or about 21 Sep 98, with intent to
deceive, make to the Financial Management Office, an
official statement, to wit: by signing the
Remission/Waiver Application Form stating you were "not
aware of debt," which statement was totally false, and
was then known by you to be so false. Suspended
reduction to A1C. Forfeiture of $615.00 pay per month
for 2 months, and a reprimand. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 06 OCT 97 - Late for duty and falsifying an official
government document.
LOR, 06 OCT 97 - Financial irresponsibility.
MFR, Undated - Dereliction of duty.
LOC, 05 MAY 97 - Financial irresponsibility.
f . CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 31 Oct 95 - 07 Jun 96 Incirlik AB 5 (CRO)
07 Jun 96 - 06 Jun 97 SHAPE 3 (Annual)
08 Jun 97 - 07 Jun 98 SHAPE 2 (Annua1)REF
08 Jun 98 - 07 Jun 99 SHAPE 2 (Annual) REF
h. Awards & Decs: AFCM, AFAM, AFOUA W/3 OLCS, AFGCM W/1 OLC, SWASM W/1
SS, AFOSSTR W/1 OLC, AFOSLTR, AFLSAR, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (07) Yrs (01) Mos (08) Das
TAMS: (06) Yrs (09) Mos (04) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 30 May 05.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I feel I was unjustly discharged and my military career was full
of positive accomplishments. I had agreed to a General discharge only after
being told the discharge would be upgraded to honorable after 6 months. The
information I was given was incorrect, and since my discharge, I have been an
outstanding citizen, having used my experience from the Air Force to work for
various television news stations in Las Vegas and Boston. I transferred to
Public Relations a year ago, and have quickly moved into management at one of
the largest PR firms in Las Vegas. I achieved a lot of things during my time in
the military, and although my discharge doesn't full show it, I fulfilled my
duty and served my country to the best of my ability. Aside from some minor
incidents, I had a stellar career, and now I am trying to use my GI Bill to
better myself. I respectfully request a change to Honorable so that I may take
advantage of the benefits that I paid into.
ATCH
1. DD Form 214 (Member-4).
MEMORANDUM FOR -J
AFNEWS
FROM: DET 1, AFNEWS/CC
DET 1,
SUBJECT: Notification Letter - Board Hearing
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a
pattern of misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline
according to AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, under the provisions of section^,
paragraph 5.50.2. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation
authority to support this recommendation are attached.
2. My reasons for this action are that:
a. You, were, the driver of a vehicle a t the time of an accident in which said
vehicle was involved, and having said accident, did, at or near Mons, Belgium,
on or about 18 October 1998, wrongfully leave the scene of the accident
without making your identity known. For this action, you received nonjudicial
punishment under Article 15, UCMJ on 23 J u n 99. This Article 15mas filed in
a UIF on 28 J u n 99 (Atch la).
b. You, did, a t Shape, Belgium, on diverse occasions between on or about 5
-
Feb 99 to on or about 12 Mar 99, make and utter to Benelux Finance Office,
Disbursing Office certain checks, in words and figures as follows, to wit: nine
hundred twenty five dollars, in United States currency, for the purpose of
cashing six personal checks, and thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain
sufficient funds i'n the Navy Federal Credit Union for payment of such checks
in full upon presentment for payment. For this action, you received a vacation
of your suspended punishment under Article 15, UCMJ on 4 J u n 99 (Atch lb).
c. You, did, a t Shape, Belgium, ..
.- ~ . < .
,:. .::'
.<..L'.irn "-,-.
J ;>-.;.*
a';:-
J.,
2..
'*C.T.:r.,
: ' *$,7?*c..2$',7,
..-Ti .*:.$+$+.
.. : ..
:. .=,; 7 ;z*:~*>.:~.$&:<~~
-, .$, s.:-\bL>.x
. . , .
..t-::::&.; . c -.- ... ..: ,.
. : *.:" ...:.5.>77L,
. . . .:*.,*.",~~
., . . .: ...
.....
< L
. ,.
..--,
. .
.
.
. .
.
.
_.-
your appointed place of duty, to wit: AFN Shape, Belgium and you, did,' on or '
about 27 August 1997, fail to obey a lawful general regulation, to wit DoD
regulation 5 120.20-R. For these actions you received an LOR dated 6 Oct 97
(Atch Id).
e. You, did, at Shape, Belgium, on diverse occasions between on or about
25 Feb 97 to on or about 6 Oct 97, make and utter to Benelux Finance Office,
Disbursing Office certain checks, in words and figures as follows, to wit: two
thousand dollars, in United States currency, for the purpose of cashing four
personal checks, and thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain sufficient funds -
in the Navy Federal Credit Union for payment of such checks in full upon
presentment for payment. For this action, you received a n LOR dated 6 Oct 9 7
(Atch le).
f. You, did, at Shape Belgium, on or about 2 May 97, being in debit to Hertz
Rental Car, dishonorably failed to pay said debt and you, did, make and utter
to Benelux Finance Office, Disbursing Office certain checks, in words and
figures for United States currency, for the purpose of cashing personal checks,
and thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain sufficient funds in the Navy
Federal Credit Union for payment of such checks in full upon presentment for
payment. For this action, you received a LOC dated 5 May 9 7 [Atch If).
3. This action could result in your separation with a n under other than
honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge. I am recommending that you receive
a n under other than honorable conditions discharge. The commander
exercising Special Court-Martial jurisdiction or a higher authority will make the
final decision in this matter. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for
reenlistment in the United States Air Force and will probably be denied
enlistment in any component of the armed forces. Additionally, any special
pay, bonus, or education assistance funds you have received may be subject to
recoupment.
4. You have the right to:
-
a. Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
.. -
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the
board hearing.
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making a
decision to waive any of your rights.
.-.+-Ar.-
*.v,*.:
,.$-
.... :,
.
,. . ..7;,-.i.:.
. . .. :.,.
.
, .. . , . . .
..
. .> ,.:..-*-.
>... ,?;z;;p...,-
. . . ,~.
.?2
. , ,-.';,
.- C
. <
, ..i>rt:gfi*
_
* .
. -
., . .
. i._.__.
__ .
,- ___ _
,._ ._ _ _ ._ __
.
.
5. You have previously been scheduled for a medical examination.
_..
.._._ --.__F
__-_.--..
--
---*-----.-
-
'
6. Military legal counsel, ~a~q-1,
located at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany, DSN 452-6174, has been obtained
to assist y
Area Defense Counsel,
nt has been scheduled for you to consult Capt
. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have
Jul 99 at
another if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is
reasonably available a s determined according to AFI 5 1-20 1. In addition to
military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force
does not pay expenses incident to the employment of civilian counsel. Civilian
counsel, if employed, must be readily .available. The Area Defense Counsel
requests you pick-up the Administrative Discharge Booklet one-day prior to
your appointment.
7. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing to me, within 7 workdays
from this date, specifying the rights you choose to exercise as noted in
paragraph four by completing one of the election statements I will give you.
The statements I will give you must be signed in the presence of your counsel
who will also sign acknowledging your decision. If you waive your right to a
hearing before an administrative discharge board, you may submit written
statements on your own behalf. I will send the statements to the discharge
authority with the case file to be considered with this recommendation. If you
fail to respond, your failure will constitute a waiver of the right to the board
hearing.
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy
Act of 1974. A copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the orderly
room.
/
9. If you request a board and you fail to appear without good cause, your
failure to appear constitutes a waiver of your right to be present at the hearing.
10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
-
Attachments:
1. Supporting' Documents
p
a. AF Form 3070, Record &jNonjudicial Punishdent Proceedings (NJP)
23Jun 99 and A F Form 1058 dated 28 J u n 99
b. AF Form 366, Record of Proceedings of Suspended NJP, 4 J u n 99
1 c. AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings, 4 Dec 98
and AF Form 1058 dated 29 Jan 99
d. LOR, 6 Oct 97
e. LOR,. 6 Oct 97
f. DA Form 4856, General Counseling Form, 5 May 97
2. 0 ther Derogatory Information
.
a. Finance Returned Check Notice, 23 Apr 99
b. Finance Returned Check Notice, 14 Apr 99
c. Notification of Indebtedness, 8 Jun 98
d. Finance Returned Check Notice, 17 Aug 97
e. Memo for Record (MFR), 30 Jul96
f. MFR, undated
3. Airman's Acknowledgment
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0004
The misconduct included failing to obey a lawful order, dereliction of duty and failure to go to appointed place of duty. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the foregoing, I recommend you separate the respondent from the-united States Air Force with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, and if discharged, how your service will be characterized.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00449
The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on August 1 1, 1997) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. MFR, 23 OCT 98 - Failed to report to two scheduled appointments. For this conduct you received an Article 15 dated 21 - - - - - - Transitional Assistance Briefings) as evidenced by a Memo for Record m. On 22 October 1998, you failed to report to two scheduled...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00325
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2006-00325 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. For failing to perform assigned duties properly, you received an RIC...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0533
SAF/MIBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0853 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of his general discharge to honorable. This misconduct is evidenced by an Article 15 action, dated 29 Jul 99 and an Unfavorable Information File, dated 9 Aug 99, (Atch fe). j- On or about 11 Sep 98, you were derelict in the performance of your duties as bay orderly, by leaving your...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00002
The applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go to her appointed place of duty. The records also indicated the applicant continued her misconduct and was administratively disciplined for being late for duty, forwarding chain letters over the Air Force email, failure to carry out instructions, sleeping in the lounge during duty hours, disrespect towards an NCO, failure to complete CDCs and test failure, dereliction of duty, failure to go, insubordinate conduct towards an NCO on two...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00373
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR I TO: SAFhlRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00373 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00142
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) Es. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp 2993-00142 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0150
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢7992-0150 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at Scott AFB, IL on June 2, 2003. She was apprehended for possessing alcohol the day after she was issued a Letter of Reprimand.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00025
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant’s discharge should not be changed. As a result, you received a LOR, dated 8 Jun 99. Letter of Counseling, dated 23 Dec 98 | 3.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00063
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. (Atch 2) c. On 18 May 99, you misplaced an apex tool and failed to return it to the appropriate place: For this infraction, you received a Record of Individual Counseling (RIG) on 20 May 99. 7 Attachments: I. LOR, 6 Mar 98.