DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 10438-08
21 January 2009
This ig in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 December 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 13 May 2004.
You received at least one nonjudicial punishment for failure to
obey a lawful order. Although the discharge processing documents
are not in your record, it appears that your commanding officer
recommended that you be separated with a general discharge by
reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. On 27 April
2006, you were separated from the Navy with a general discharge
by reason of misconduct and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry
code when a Sailor is discharged by reason of misconduct. Since
you have been treated no differently than others in your
Situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
assignment of your reentry code. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
tn this regard, it is important to keep im mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\SRuer
W. DEAN PF!
Executive
Oe
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09382-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2008. On 18 December 2000, you were separated from the Navy with a general discharge by reason of misconduct and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03007-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 September 2001. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02215-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 Nay 2001. The Board did not consider whether...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02215-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 Nay 2001. The Board did not consider whether...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07769-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 6 September 1989. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05046-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An RE-4 reentry code must be assigned to all Sailors discharged due to misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07225-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 16 March 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07105-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2009. On 14 May 2003 an administrative discharge board recommended that you be separated from the Navy with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to a civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11532-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reentry code. official records.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03051-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval _record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the “existence of probabl¢...