DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS
Docket No: 11532-08
24 March 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 February 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 17 September
2002. On 3 December 2003 you received nonjudicial punishment for
insubordination, failure to obey a lawful order, making false
official statements, writing worthless checks, and failure to pay
just debts. On 24 March 2004 you received a general discharge by
reason of misconduct, and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry
code when a Sailor is discharged by reason of misconduct. Since
you have been treated no differently than others in your
situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
assignment of your reentry code. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision pon submission of new and materia.
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that 2
presumption of regularity attaches to all. official records.
Consequently, when. applying for a correction of an official navi!
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\Sputan
W. DEAN PF
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00475 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01342-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12182-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded, however, that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct, there is no basis for any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07651-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. . The Board concluded, however, that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct, and as you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to grant an exception to that policy, there is no basis for any corrective action in your case. consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01360-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded, however, that as the assignment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct, and as you have not demonstrated that ak would be in the interest of justice for the Board to grant an exception to that policy, there is no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02853-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR632 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00907-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2012. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is required when a Sailor is separated at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09512-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06374-09
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative - regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...