Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06932-08
Original file (06932-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

DIC
Docket No. 6932-08
5 September 2008

 

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 September 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice Were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Dof-umentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all Material submitted in
support thpreof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulationgb and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/591 dtd 14
Aug 08, a topy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The Board dlso found the following factors militated against
granting ydu relief. The extension was Proper when: executed.
Governing yegulations require reenlistment in the same fiscal
year as the EAOS. Those regulations are not arbitrary; rather,
they are raltionally related to furthering the Navy’s legitimate
interest in} managing reenlistment bonuses in various communities
by fiscal year. Additionally, although any future reenlistment
bonus may nbt be tax free, you will not be denied the
reenlistment bonus itself. Finally the Board found that by
granting yor application, an undesired precedent may be set.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of |the members of the panel will be furnished upon

request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favdrable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have

the Boar
material
the Boar
a presump
Consequen
naval rec
existence

 

Enclosure

In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
ion of regularity attaches to all official records.
ly, when applying for a correction of an official
rd, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

rod)

W. DEAN PF F
Executive e rr

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06061-08

    Original file (06061-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is e naval rec A three-mé Records, applicatid injustice regulation Board. Your allegations of error and were reviewed in accordance with administrative S and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this cumentary material considered by the Board consisted plication, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. tly, when applying for a correction of an official ord, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06093-08

    Original file (06093-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06049-08

    Original file (06049-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Dotumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence|of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06004-08

    Original file (06004-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your applicatidn on 4 September 2008. your allegations of error and injustice |were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application. Those regulations are not arbitrary; rather, they are rationally related to furthering the Navy’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03754-08

    Original file (03754-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Dodcumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thlereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence|of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05534-08

    Original file (05534-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your applicatidn on 4 September 2008. Ddcumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support tHereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Those regulations are not arbitrary; rather, they are rationally related to furthering the Navy’s legitimate interest ih managing reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05579-08

    Original file (05579-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03773-09

    Original file (03773-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Sincerely, TR QOD tomeae Foe W. DEAN PFEIFFER es | Executive Director ( Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD © QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1040 MMEA 26 May 09 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BCNR DOCKET NO 03773-09; REQUEST...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08348-08

    Original file (08348-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 3. after a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters concurs in the professional evaluation of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06320-08

    Original file (06320-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting application on 2 injustice were r regulations and Board. in executive session, considered your February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated copy of which is attached.