Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08348-08
Original file (08348-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS

Docket No: 8348-08
31 August 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your.
application on 26 August 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this .
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 11 December
2008, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Boar@ reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFE

Executive D

   
  
 

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD

QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103
IN HEPLY REFER TO

1040
MMER/RE
11 Bec 08

MEMORANDUM FOR ‘THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Sud: BONE BPEL CAGTON IN THE CASE OF FORMER
Pt p SUB : RE-CODE

    

Enel: (1) NavmMc 118 (17)
(2) MCRD 1900/17 of 5 Feb 07
(3) Reeruit Evaluation Form of 26 Jan 0?
(4) SP Form 600 of 3 Jan 07
°45) DD Form 214
(6) CMC, ltr 1910/MMSR - 3 of 9 Dec 08
i ie BD Form i149 of 5 Feb 07

 
    

Ba a a soa fg service record has been reviewed and it has been determined
that alt the cite of separation he was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3F,
which means failure to comphete recruit training.

  

ar emshould have received an “Uncharacterized’ discharge from the

U.S, “Mar ine Corps per enclosure (6). A review of the administrative portion

of his record shows that he was informed of the reenlistment code RE- 3F with
narrative reason of “Entry Level Performance and Conduct” for failure to

oes

‘adapt to military environment.

3. after a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters concurs in
the professional evaluation of a Wealifications for reenlistment
at the time of separation. Once "code 18 correctly assigned it is not
routinely changed or upgraded as a result of events that occur after
separation or based on merely on the passage of time.

 
  

4. fnelosure {7) is returned for final agha

 

Head, Ber Poumance Evaluation
Review Branch

Manpower Management Division

By the direction of the Commandant
Of the Marine Corps

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10005-07

    Original file (10005-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Headquarters, Marine Corps, Performance Evaluation Review Branch dated 6 November 2007. a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03432-05

    Original file (03432-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 May 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03424-05

    Original file (03424-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 15 April 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11088-08

    Original file (11088-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, LyQaas W. DEAN PFE Pxecutive Dareator Enclosure wEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05711-07

    Original file (05711-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, applied to this Board requesting to change his reason for separation "Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service" and RE-3F reenlistment code. On 12 October 2006, while Petitioner was in absentia, his commanding officer at recruit training initiated an entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment, fraudulent entry, and void enlistment. e. Attached as enclosure (2) is an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05690-07

    Original file (05690-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on ________ petition to correct his record to show he received a reserve retirement from the Marine Corps.2. To qualify fora reserve...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01706-07

    Original file (01706-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 31 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 10234-03

    Original file (10234-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 29 December 2003, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01798-08

    Original file (01798-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. If after thirty days subsequent to receipt of this letter you have not yet received a DD Form 215 correcting your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06911-07

    Original file (06911-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Once a code is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as a result of events that occur after separation or based on merely on the passage of time.4 Enclosure (6) is returned for final actionHead, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By the...