DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 6714-08
22 August 2008
your application, together with all material submi
thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes,
Accordingly,
tes of the
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\Ss
W. DEAN PFEIF
Executive Dire
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08599-08
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9, July 2009. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for further service by reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09105-08
In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 6 August 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07160-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2011. The Board considered your contention to the effect that you believe you are entitled to “full benefits”, but found it insufficient to demonstrate that your disability was incurred in or aggravated by your service in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04145 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04145 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10065-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 8 March 1956 he was honorably discharged from the Navy Reserve with 13 years, 3 months, and 21 days of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08743-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter from the Navy Personnel Command, dated 24 May 2005, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04504-02
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. absence of evidence that the removal of your name from the TDRL and your discharge the Navy were erroneous, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03965-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. after the dismissal was approved at all level of review, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Manpower and Reserve Affairs, directed the execution of your dismissal from the Naval Service, and on 5 May 2006, you were issued a letter of dismissal. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06054-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...