Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08743-05
Original file (08743-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX     TRG
          WASI-IINGTON DC 20370-5100       Docket No: 8743 - 05
                  16 March 2007










This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter from the Navy Personnel Command, dated 24 May 2005, a copy of which is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the letter from the Navy Personnel Command.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



 W. DEAN PFEIFFER
          Executive Director



.
 Enclosure








DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
         MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000        




                 1070
          PBRS-3 12D1/06
          MAY 2 4 2005




This is in response to your inquiry concerning your eligibility for retirement from the U. S. Navy. I conducted a thorough review of your service record in addition to the documents you provided me. I have concluded that you had nearly 21 years of service as of the date of your discharge on 8 December 1984. Your service included 3 years and 6 days with the U. S. Coast Guard; 2 years, 11 months and 9 days with the U. S. Anny Reserve; and 15 years with the U. S. Navy. This is a total of 20 years, 11 months and 15 days.
While you have nearly 21 years of military service, you only have about 13 years of qualifying years for retirement. A qualifying year must be at least 50 points at the end of your anniversary year. Therefo r e, you have about 7 years where you did not satisfy or meet the requirement of obtaining the 50 points each year.
In addition, I am enclosing a printout issued by the Naval Reserve Personnel Center, New Orleans that supports the information I have outlined in the above paragraphs. If you believe that you are eligible for retirement from the Navy, I suggest that you petition the Navy’s Board for Correction of Naval Records and have them review your record. I have enclosed a (DD Form 149) for your convenience. I am also returning your photograph and documents you provided me. I will be returning your service record to the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis.

Sincerely,



                                                      
Supervisor,
 Records Support Branch

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004093

    Original file (20080004093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her discharge from the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and her records corrected to show she transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant provides orders, dated 22 July 1998, assigning her to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement); discharge orders, dated 21 October 1999; and her notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (her 20-year letter). If a Soldier does not earn the required 50 retirement points during a retirement year and the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05820-06

    Original file (05820-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I suspect this is what flagged him for the MOB.Putting aside for the moment why the gain was improperly conducted (investigating, member was not gained [to the] unit early Nov due to detailer [being] behind 1 month on his issuing orders, this was roughly the same time the MOB was being prepared), respectfully request guidance on whether this new information will result in a change to his mobilization status .At another point during processing of the case, you stated that reservists who are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500623

    Original file (ND0500623.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Members of the Review Board: Overview: The purpose of this petition to the Board for Correction of Naval Records is to ask for consideration of an upgrade to my discharge from the U. S. Navy that occurred on June 11, 1997. Upon graduation from high school in May 1997, I completed my processing into the US. I authorize separation from the naval service with an Entry Level Separation.” PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09599-04

    Original file (09599-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. We contacted the Exam Center and the Passed Not Advanced (PNA) Points were entered administratively. PERSONNEL ON LINE LISTING (POLL) DATE: 07205 RATING, PAY, LOSS LAST UPDATE: 07005 SCIND: XFXXX CREATE DATE: 990723 SEX: M

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04417-00

    Original file (04417-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 February 1971 you reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for six years. your years of qualifying service for reserve retirement. IN REPLY REFER TO 1821 MMSR-5 '14 Nov 96 Dear concerning record to the United that although 11 months are (IRR) United States Code, sections 12731 and 12732, require 365/366 day period in which a member earns a This is in response to your letter of 27 August 1996, your eligibility for Reserve Retired Pay.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10164-05

    Original file (10164-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The record shows that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 17 September 1940 and were appointed a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2005-00469

    Original file (FD2005-00469.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received a General Discharge, Under Honorable Conditions, for Unsatisfactory Participation in the Kansas Air National Guard. Naval Reserve from 18 Apr 85 through 7 Jul 97 is 9 yrs 7 months 21 days, of which AMS is 1 yr 3 months 9 days (See Army and Navy Annual Statements and AF Forms 526 for TMS and TAMS numbers) . (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00001

    Original file (FD2005-00001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARTNG RECORD INITIAL) I I 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRLEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING DATE 15 Jun 2005 CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00001 Case heard at Washington, D.C. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05888-01

    Original file (05888-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Service for Naval Reserve Retirement, you have only been credited with six years, six months and two days of qualifying service for reserve retired pay at age 60. effective 1 May 1993, this is an honorary status...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001

    Original file (Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...