Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04504-02
Original file (04504-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

JRE
Docket No: 4504-02
2 December 2002

This  is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting
session, considered your application on 15 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed   in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted  of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board

  in executive

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error
injustice.

 or

The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 6 April 1989 to 20 January
1995,  when you were released from active duty and transferred to the Temporary Disability
Retired List  
2001, the President, Physical Evaluation Board,
directed that your name be removed from the TDRL, and requested the Chief of Naval
Personnel to effect your discharge from the Navy because of your failure to report of periodic
physical examinations.

(TDRL). On 11 January  

The Board did not accept your unsubstantiated contention to the effect that your failure
report for periodic physical examinations occurred through no fault of your own.
absence of evidence that the removal of your name from the TDRL and your discharge
the Navy were erroneous, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your
case.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The names and votes of the members

 to
In the

 from

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be

taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12476-10

    Original file (12476-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06267-03

    Original file (06267-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In the absence of evidence that demonstrates that your and that your failure to do so might I name was removed from the TDRL erroneously, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00428-08

    Original file (00428-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5683 14

    Original file (NR5683 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board did not have any evidence to support an error or injustice that would require your reinstatement to the TDRL.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02304-09

    Original file (02304-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00057-07

    Original file (00057-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2007. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You should note, however, that during the period when your name was on the TDRL, military retired pay entitlements were offset dollar for dollar against...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03264-00

    Original file (03264-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2001. As you did not appear for the examination, the President, Physical Evaluation Board directed, on 7 March 2000, that your name be removed from the TDRL and that you be discharged without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00878-07

    Original file (00878-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you were released from active duty on 28 February 2002 and transferred to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04829-05

    Original file (04829-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    04829-05 10 October 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08664-09

    Original file (08664-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ”A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. On 1 October 1996 the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) reviewed that report of that examination and determined that you remained unfit | for duty due to a seizure disorder, which was ratable at 20%. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...