Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01792-06
Original file (01792-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
         2NAVYANNEX       Docket No: 1792-06
          WASHINGTONDC 203705100   30 November 2006







 This is in reference to your applicati o n for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provision of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for c orrection of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable o the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considere d by the Board consisted of your application, together with all ma t erial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applica tion statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board c onsidered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Man e Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consider ation of the entire record, the Board found that the evide n ce submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained n the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your .case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon sub m ission of new and material evidence or other matter not previousl y considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to kee p in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to 11 official records. Consequently, when applying for a corr e ction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error o injustice.







Enclosure
 Sincere ly




 ,

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MAR E CORPS
                                             3280 RUSSELL ROAD
 QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134.51
                                             IN REPLY REFER TO
                                                                                                   1910
                                                                                                    MMSR-3
                                                                                 22 Jun 06
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS

 Subj:    BCNR APPLICA TION IN THE CASE OF FORMER PFC . Subj: R EQ UEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION
Ref:     (a) Chairman, BCNR ltr AEG:jdh D ocket No.: 01792-06 of 31 Mar 06
1.       The reference requests an advisory opinion concerning the basis of       discharge.
2.       states he was called t active duty from the
3.      
•        inactive reserves in support of the Cu an Missile Crisis and not for training.
3.       A review of his Official Military P ersonnel File shows he was assigned for active duty training or a period of six months starting 25 July 1960 at which time he began recruit training at MCRD, San Diego, CA then Individual Co at Training (ICT) at Camp Pendleton, CA. He was released f om active duty training on 24 January 1961 and joined his rese ye unit the next day and served with honor until his discharge n 03 June 1966.
4.       Based on this information it is ap arent that 4IU~. was called to active duty for initial ecruit and individual combat training and not specifically i support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. As a result, there wa no error in marking his DD Form 214 “AD TNG” and this marking n no way detracts from the quality of his service.
5.       Point of contact is Mr. Goodwine a (703) 784-9322.



H ead Separation and
Reti ement Branch
By d rect ion of the Commandant
of t e Marine Corps

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05866-06

    Original file (05866-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The reference requests an advisor opinion onpetition t correct his record to showThat he was retired as a Colonel (0-6 and issue him a SE~ code that calculates his retired pay in a onstandard mannerclaims that his retirement as a Lieutenant Colonel and the SEP code 4ie was assigned upon...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05682-06

    Original file (05682-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support there f, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion(furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluations Review Branch, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02992-99

    Original file (02992-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified the contested fitness report by completely eliminating the reviewing officer's certification. 'ARTMENT OF T H E NAVY HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 1 3 4 - 5 1 0 3 1610 MAY - 3 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOhtid FOR CORRECTION OF IN REPLY REFER TO: NAVAL RECORDS Subj : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02430-03

    Original file (02430-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. V I R G I N I A 22 1 3 4 - 9 1 03 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB MAR 1 8 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISOR SERGEAN HE CASE OF STAFF SMC Ref: (a) SSgt (b) MCO P1610.7E DD Form 149 of 30 Dec 02 1. 'CH"...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05106-99

    Original file (05106-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY H E A D Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D S T A T E S M A R I N E C O R P S 3280 RUSSELL R O A D Q U A N T I C O , V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 1 0 3 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO: 1610 MMER/PERB MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02101-03

    Original file (02101-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2003. Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness reports: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report 13 Jul 88 9 Jan 89 Capt Capt P 880414 to 880704 (DC) 880705 to 881231 (SA) 2. The Commandant of the Marine Corps is not empowered to grant or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02794-99

    Original file (02794-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. by the Board. In this regard, the Board emphasizes that official SRB counseling entries and Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) CASE OF STAFF performance counseling/feedback are two separate and distinct administrative actions.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00211-99

    Original file (00211-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 January 1999, a copy of which is attached. In his letter appended to reference (a), the Reporting Senior states that the Section C comments reflect a true...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01120-01

    Original file (01120-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From available information and the guidance delineated in the enclosure, authority acted appropriately in the revocation of the Joint Service Commendation Medal in the case of Staff Sergeant any Defense decoration for a or service may be revoked if it appears the awarding Since this is a Department of Defense awards issue, it is 2. recommended that this case be directed to that agency for an advisory opinion. Any Defense decoration for a distinguished act, achievement, or service may be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00230-99

    Original file (00230-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 11 January 1999, a copy of which is attached. Certainly poor management of his supply account, as concluded in the investiga- tion and correctly recorded by the...