DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 05077-08
14 July 2008
ATTN ie.
Dear Si’ ae.
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July
2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/427 of 10 Jun 08, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN BF
Executive Dir
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380S5-0000
1430
Ser 811/427
10 Jun 08
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via: PERS-31C
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref: (a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 27 Apr 08
(b) BUPERSINST 1430.16E
Encl: (1) BCNR File
Ll. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner’s request.
2. The member is requesting to have his PMA changed for Cycle 191 Mar
06 Navy-wide advancement examination from 3.85 to 3.87 using three
evaluations.
3. The petitioner’s record reflects four evaluations for the period of
Ol March 2003 to 28 February 2006 (period to compute PMA for Cycle 191),
with a PMA average of 3.85.
. ; . 5
4. In view of the above, recommend member’s record remains as is.
5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the
Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is
returned.
(ez. -
C. E. AIMESTILLMAN
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06548-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materia] submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable gtatutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is Jan advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Cdrrection of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07545-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01413-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02265-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on &8 dune 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is’ on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05624-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 48llAl/394, 11 August 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11374-09
The Board also considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Personnel Command (NPC) attached as enclosure (2) that recommended no relief be granted. Note: If the special evaluation had been factored into Petitioner’s PMA before the examination, Petitioner would have reached the Final Multiple Score necessary to advance from the March 2008 Navy- wide advancement cycle. The Board carefully considered the comments included in enclosure (2) to the effect that a special evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05921-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 4811E9/064, 7 February 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00077-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material -submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/198 of 27 Feb 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07921-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.