Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00077-08
Original file (00077-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
 Docket No. 00077-08
24 March 2008



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 U SC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in e xecutive session, considered your application on March 24, 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
-submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/198 of 27 Feb 08, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. -
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


         W. DEAN PFIEFFER        
Executive Director



Enclosure



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000


                            1430
                                                                                           Ser 811/198
                                                                                          27 Feb 08 –




MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
 Via:     PERS-31C
Subj:    BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:     (a) SNN’s DD Form 149 dtd 17 Dec 07
End:     (1) BCNR File
1.       In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.
2.       The petitioner is requesting her CTR1 advancement be
 adjusted to reflect her advancement from the March 2007 Navy-
 wide Advancement Examination Cycle 195 vice September 2007 Cycle
196.
3.       Member’s Cycle 195 March 2007 was inadvertently destroyed at Navy Information Operations Command (NIOC) Maryland based on an erroneous Physical Fitness Assessment failing score. In order to assess the opportunity to advance during the missed advancement cycle, the member’s Cycle 196 Final Multiple (FMS) Score was compared with Cycle 195 last increment MNR score. Member’s FMS of 174.09 for Cycle 196 is lower than Cycle 195’s last increment NNR score of 180.58. Member did not meet the required Cycle 195 MMR for advancement to CTR1 based on her Cycle 196 FMS.
4.       In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as is.
5.       This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.

~
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02628-09

    Original file (02628-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum tc reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06548-08

    Original file (06548-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materia] submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable gtatutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is Jan advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Cdrrection of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01413-08

    Original file (01413-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10587-07

    Original file (10587-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/057 of 16 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07290-07

    Original file (07290-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8llE9/535, of 16 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09999-07

    Original file (09999-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/034 of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03070-09

    Original file (03070-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner is requesting advancement to E5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02059-09

    Original file (02059-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07391-07

    Original file (07391-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811E9/536 of 16 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12258-08

    Original file (12258-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They reason that although the command erred in allowing Petitioner to take the September 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam for I1T3, Petitioner was not eligible to take the exam per BUPERINST 1430.16F which states that...