Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04583-08
Original file (04583-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100

BUG
Docket No: 4583-08

2 July 2009

 

ee. Ree

This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your

- application on 1 July 2009. Your allegations of error and

injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material .
submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. The Board found that you entered active
duty in the Navy on 11 December 2003. Your record is

incomplete, however, apparently you were diagnosed with a
personality disorder, and separated for it with an honorable

discharge and an RE~4 reenlistment code, on 25 August 2005.

The Board, in its review of your entire record, carefully
weighed all potential mitigation, such as your youth, family
problems, and current desire to serve your country in the

‘military. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that: these factors

were not sufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code
because of your diagnosed personality disorder. In view of the
above, your application has been denied. The names and votes
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it ig important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

\ Qu.

W. DEAN PFEI
Executive Di t

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09261-08

    Original file (09261-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2009. On 28 June 1995, you were diagnosed with a schizoid personality disorder, and found to be a danger to yourself and others if not administratively separated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant ‘to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07925-08

    Original file (07925-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08781-08

    Original file (08781-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07189-08

    Original file (07189-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09458-08

    Original file (09458-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. of fraudulent entry due to failure to disclose your prior service, history of psychiatric treatment, and the diagnosis of a delusional disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and a paranoid personality disorder. Further, the Board concluded that your diagnosed psychiatric disorders were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06101-08

    Original file (06101-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder and are considered a potential risk to harm themselves or others if retained. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09275-08

    Original file (09275-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on 8 July 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board believed you may be entitled to veterans’ benefits based on your general discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07070-08

    Original file (07070-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 September 1992, you received an honorable discharge due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09082-08

    Original file (09082-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given the diagnosis of a personality disorder, and the fact that you were found unsuitable to work in a Naval environment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07362-08

    Original file (07362-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. Nevertheless, the Board found i that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given the diagnosis of a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.