DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SN
; Docket No: 07362-08
. ; 16 June 2009
Dear ee ari ae
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 June 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
26 June 2001 at age 18. Based on the information currently
contained in your record it appears that you served without
incident for over three years until you were diagnosed with a
personality disorder. Additionally, it appears you were notified
of pending administrative separation action by reason of
convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality
disorder. You elected to waive the rights to consult counsel, or
submit a statement.
On 15 July 2004, you signed an enlisted evaluation covering the
period from 16 June 2003 to 15 June 2004, which did not recommend
you for retention. You were honorably discharged and assigned an
RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall
record of service, the character letters accompanying your
application, and your contention that your RE-4 reenlistment code
was never explained to you. Nevertheless, the Board found i that
these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your
reenlistment code given the diagnosis of a personality disorder.
An RE-4 reenlistment code is routinely assigned under such
circumstances. With regard to your contention, the record shows
that, on 15 July 2004, you signed an administrative remarks page
acknowledging why you were receiving a restrictive reenlistment
code. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
WR QATAR
FoHW. DEAN EIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11385-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that the severity of your diagnosed personality disorder was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06052-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2009. Therefore, on 24 August 2009, you were separated with an honorable discharge and an RE-4 reenlistment code due to a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01269-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11001-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SUN Docket No: 11001-08 5 October 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2009. Nevertheless, the Board Fouud that these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01834-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your’ application on 12 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board ‘consisted of “your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02070-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2009. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your reenlistment code because of the severity of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08781-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04607-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 November 2004, you were counseled regarding deficiencies in your performance and conduct and warned that further infractions could result in disciplinary action or administrative separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10668-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors _ were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code, which was based on your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07070-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 September 1992, you received an honorable discharge due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.