Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09261-08
Original file (09261-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BUG
Docket No: 9261-08
7 July 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval

Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval and medical records,
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material

error or injustice. The Board found that you entered active

duty in the Navy on 8 June 1995. You began a period of
unauthorized absence (UA) on 16 June 1995, which ended on

27 June 1995. On 28 June 1995, you were diagnosed with a
schizoid personality disorder, and found to be a danger to
yourself and others if not administratively separated. On
30 June 1995, you received an uncharacterized entry level
separation for your diagnosed personality disorder, and were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record, carefully
weighed all potential mitigation, such as your youth, current
desire to serve in the military, post service good conduct, and
character letter. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these
factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your
reenlistment code because of your UA and diagnosed personality
disorder. In view of the above, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will
be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such

' that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant ‘to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,
\s
Executive tor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07509-08

    Original file (07509-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09458-08

    Original file (09458-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. of fraudulent entry due to failure to disclose your prior service, history of psychiatric treatment, and the diagnosis of a delusional disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and a paranoid personality disorder. Further, the Board concluded that your diagnosed psychiatric disorders were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10778-08

    Original file (10778-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2009. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to your reenlistment code due your personality disorder. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01320-09

    Original file (01320-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given your diagnosed personality disorder, and risk of harm to yourself. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09027-08

    Original file (09027-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 June 1995, your commanding officer forwarded your case to the separation authority, recommending a general discharge. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04312-08

    Original file (04312-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01169-01

    Original file (01169-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08665-00

    Original file (08665-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 2 NAVY ANNE NA’JAL RECORD X S WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 8665-00 11 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicatilon for correction of your A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations and procedures applicable to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10212-10

    Original file (10212-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01961-09

    Original file (01961-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations; and policies. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your misconduct and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...