DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
TRG
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 4231-08
21 January 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 January 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 22 July 1998 and reported to the
Naval Academy Preparatory School (NAPS). You were honorably
discharged on 13 November 1998 with a narrative reason for
separation for your failure to complete commissioning or warrant
officer program (NAPS). The Separation Program Designator (SPD)
code was KHD and you were assigned an RE-3K reenlistment code.
You are requesting a change in the RE-3K reenlistment code
because you are contemplating a career in Federal law enforcement
and/or obtaining a commission in the military.
As indicated in the enclosed pages from the regulations in effect
at the time of your service and in effect now, the only
authorized reenlistment codes when an SPD of KHD is used is RE-3K
or RE-3Q. Therefore, it is clear that you have been treated no
differently than other individuals who have failed to complete a
Navy commissioning program. This code may be waived and
enlistment authorized and is therefore not considered to be
derogatory.
Since you have been treated no differently than others in your
Situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
assignment of the R#-3K reenlistment code. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\ peas
W. DEAN PF
Executive DivteStor
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03915-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3K reentry code is waivable and is the most favorable you could have received under your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08445-10
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-3K reentry code due to your request to be disenrolled from OCS.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07178-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Therefore, given your pre-service suicidal ideation and threat to kill yourself while at recruit training, and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06211-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations. so discharged on 13 November 1998. reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code You were You were not recommended for You have provided evidence that since discharge, you have completed an alcohol rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08552-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2009. Given your suicidal ideation, and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1093 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. The Board noted that applicable regulations provide that an RE-3K reentry code is the most favorable code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of being disenrolled from a commissioning program. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00739-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 17 November 2003 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the Navy with a discharge under other than honorable conditions...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04524-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2009. In your application you are requesting that an RE-3B reenlistment code be changed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The entry-level characterization of service, unfortunately, cannot be changed, as individuals are considered in an entry level status for the first 6 months of service and any separation which occurs during this period of time will receive an “uncharacterized entry level separation.” The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that, the reason for discharge on the applicant’s DD Form 214 should be changed to “Medical condition, not a disability,” removing the “Failed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07008-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. on the urinalysis you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...