Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01972-08
Original file (01972-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No: 01972-08
12 November 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure
(1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his
characterization be changed from a general discharge to an
honorable discharge.

 

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. qe@RBMM Ms. mm and Ms.
bl reviewed Petitioner's allegations ‘of error and
injustice on 29 October 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 16 August 1960. In
September 1961, Petitioner submitted a hardship separation
request in order to be released from active duty service to take
care of his ailing parents. His package consisted of medical
documentation of his parents illness and his family’s support to
be released in order to take care of them. However, his request
was denied.
c. On 31 October 1961, Petitioner was convicted at a summary
court-martial for an unauthorized absence in excess of 12 days.
Petitioner claims that he went home to take care of his parents
since his sister, who was currently taking care of them, left
them unattended.

d. On 17 January 1962, he was separated by reason of
unsuitability and received a general discharge and an RE-4
reenlistment code.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.

The Board initially notes that Petitioner initially served
without disciplinary action until his unauthorized absence due to
his parents’ illness and the denial of his hardship separation
request. The Board concludes that an honorable discharge is
warranted due to extenuating circumstances regarding his
unauthorized absence which led to his conviction at a summary
court-martial. In view of the above, the Board directs the
following relief.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show a
change in characterization from general to honorable which was
assigned on 17 January 1962.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN . BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

\woark

W. DEAN PFE
Executive di or

=>

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00438-10

    Original file (00438-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an honorable discharge vice the general characterization of service issued on 28 February 1973. His division officer and commanding officer gave a favorable recommendation endorsing his request. RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as follows: a.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04143-08

    Original file (04143-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS . Docket No: 4143-08 6 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD CFR Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10144-07

    Original file (10144-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 August 1960, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 20 November 1962, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06214-99

    Original file (06214-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6214-99 18 February 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF gail Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00418-02

    Original file (00418-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    24 May 2002 418-02 From: To: Chairman, Secretary of the Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records Subj: REVIEW CF NAVAL RECORD OF, Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy applied to this Board requesting, in effect, upgrading the discharge under other than honorable conditions issued on 1 July 1986. that his naval record be corrected...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06599-07

    Original file (06599-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in the general characterization of his service.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. C. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 30 June 1961.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02723-05

    Original file (02723-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. The field discharge board subsequently recommended that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness and you were so discharged on 14 December 1962. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01429-12

    Original file (01429-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Hotopp, Ms. Barrow, and Mr. Blanchard, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board concludes that the available evidence in the record shows that Petitioner’s period of UA from 31 December 2008 to 4 January 2009,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08450-09

    Original file (08450-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It provides Navy and Marine Corps officials with the authority to involuntarily separate those service members who commit a homosexual act or acts. Accordingly, the Board concludes that, as a matter of equity, partial relief in the form of issuing him a general discharge is appropriate.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02757-05

    Original file (02757-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...