Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01429-12
Original file (01429-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

SIN
Docket No: 01429-12
15 February 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Ret: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an
active duty enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting that the record of unauthorized
absence (UA) (NAVPERS 1070/606) forms dated 20 January and 20
February 2009, covering the period from 31 December 2008 to 4
January 2009, be removed from his Official Military Personnel
File (OMPF).

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Hotopp, Ms. Barrow, and

Mr. Blanchard, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 14 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In his application, Petitioner has submitted
documentation which indicates that the period of UA in question
was determined not to be unauthorized.
c. A review of Petitioner’s OMPF shows that on 20 January
2009, a record of UA form was submitted reporting him being
absent from 31 December 2008 and surrendering on 4 January 2009.
A gecond record of UA form was submitted on 20 February 2009
covering the same period and stated that “absence determined not
to be unauthorized”. Both were signed by the same legal leading
petty officer.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action in the form of relief.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board concludes that the available evidence in the
record shows that Petitioner’s period of UA from 31 December
2008 to 4 January 2009, was determined not to be unauthorized.
Accordingly, all such documentation in the record should be
removed.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's record of UA (NAVPERS 1070/606)
dated20 January 2009 and 20 February 2009, documenting his
absence from 31 December 2008 to 4 January 2009, be removed from
his OMPF.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

 

c. That any material direct to be removed from Petitioner’s
naval record be returned to this Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made
a part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

oo}
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J.¥ GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4031 14

    Original file (NR4031 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7601S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an active duty enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the Record of Unauthorized Absénce (NAVPERS 1070/606) form, dated 4 April 2011, covering the period from 29 to 31 March 2011, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6484 14

    Original file (NR6484 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the Record of Unauthorized Absence (NAVPERS 1070/606) dated 14 October 2003 be - removed from his record. The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Ivins, and Ms. Tollefson, reviewed: Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00888-05

    Original file (00888-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRGDocket No: 888-0516 March 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF OS2~UhIIIEhIIhIhhUIuI~ USN,Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that documentation showing a one day period of unauthorized...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06403-11

    Original file (06403-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In his application, he submits a letter from LNC(SW/AW) C---, who was the command legal chief at the time of the NUP onboard the USS WASP (LHD 1), dated 21 June 2011, stating, in part, that Petitioner had requested to have his NJP removed from his record, and it had been approved up the chain of command, which included his own signature. He also submitted another statement from his leading Chief, MMCM S~--- at the time of his NJP who also stated, in part, that his request to have his NJP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1978-13

    Original file (NR1978-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade-oef his other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service and removal of his 1 August 1980 nonjudicial punishment (NJP) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Board, consisting of Mr. Clemmons, Mr. Dixit, and Ms. Tollefson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06893-10

    Original file (06893-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed-enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 5 April to 31 December 2006 (denied on 20 March 2008, docket number 1029-08), 1 January to 31 December 2007, 1 January to 26 May 2008, 27 May to 30 June 2008, 1 July to 26 September 2008, 27 September to 31 December 2008, 1 January to 8 May 2009 and 9 May to 31...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07049-00

    Original file (07049-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    '1552 Encl: (1) Case summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this that his naval record be corrected Board requesting, in effect, by upgrading his discharge, separation, and by removing all references to a period of unauthorized absence (UA). the Board notes the document Concerning the UA of 15 to 26 March 1997 shown on the P. the NJP and the DD Form 214, Petitioner has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03984-11

    Original file (03984-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 03984-11 28 April 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: ta) 10 U.S.C; L552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich, Mr. Lippollis, and Mr. Butherus, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 April 2011 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11288-10

    Original file (11288-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Blanchard, Ms. McCormick, and Mr. J. Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 August 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 16 May 2008, Petitioner received NJP for failure to obey a lawful order. It stated, in part, that while he no longer has Petitioner's records, he most certainly “set aside” the NUP he received on 16 May 2008.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08545-08

    Original file (08545-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...