DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SMS .
Docket No: 4143-08
6 February 2009
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD CFR
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former
enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting
a general discharge vice the undesirable discharge (UD) that was
issued on 4 September 1962.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. (Riise Ms. NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04949-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an honorable characterization of service vice the general characterization of service that he received on 20 July 1964, when he was released from active duty. On 5 February 1963, he departed Quantico and at that time his proficiency and conduct mark averages were both 4.1. d. On 22 April 1963, Petitioner reported to Okinawa, Japan, for duty as a weapons...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05520-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 5520-07 28 January 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW. h. Regulations in effect at the time of Petitioner's discharge authorized a UD if separated by reason of unfitness. However, the Board considers Petitioner's prior period of service, service during the Korean War, awards, and satisfactory overall trait and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2782 14
The Board, consisting of Mr. Gattis, Mr. Grover, and Ms. Trucco, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In his application, Petitioner states that he never received a characterization of service on his DD Form 214. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 14 December 1962, he received an honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 November 1960 you received NJP for On 30 January 1961 you were convicted by convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of absence from your appointed place of duty and were sentenced to restriction and extra duty for 10 days and a $40 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00626-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 626-05 24 October 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF ~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Shortly after the conviction by SPCM, on 31 July 1960, Petitioner received adverse marks of 1.0 and 3.4 in conduct and proficiency, respectively. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10144-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 August 1960, you enlisted in the Navy at age 17 with parental consent. On 20 November 1962, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04499-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028502
The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 1 June 1959, for 3 years. On 23 January 1962, the applicant's unit commander recommended the applicant be eliminated from military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness). Accordingly, he was discharged in pay grade E-1 on 17 May 1962, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, with a general discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06863-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2O37O~5 100SMWDocket No: 6863-07 5 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2008, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00214-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 13 October 2011. On 13 December 1961, you received NUP for three incidents of failure to go to your appointed place of duty. - Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.