Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01301-08
Original file (01301-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied



HD:hd
Docket No. 01301-08
14 April 2008



HM2 DAVID R ANCHETA USN
7969 CAYENNE WAY
PENSACOLA FL 32526




Dear Petty Officer Ancheta:

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record.

The enclosed correspondence from the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations reveals that your naval record has been corrected. Accordingly, your case before this Board has been closed administratively.

Sincerely,



JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Head, Performance Section

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05754-02

    Original file (05754-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. NAV Y IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/02U0587 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RECOMMENDATION SE OF PETTY OFFICER \ Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05754-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04456-00

    Original file (04456-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (MSC) Captain Selection Boards; special selection board Naval Reserve MSC Captain Selection Board, by which you You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 through 2003 Medical Service consideration for the FY 2000 were not considered; and amendment of the remedial memorandum now in your naval record, stating you have served on active duty continuously since your discharge from the Regular Navy on 31 January 1990, to show you are “USN” (United...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00991-01

    Original file (00991-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00095-01

    Original file (00095-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Head, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NeADQUARTeRS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 134-B 103 S~BORUSSELLROAD VJRGINlA 22 OUANTICO, From: To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11C’ Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board 1. has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your Naval record. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09593-02

    Original file (09593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05392-10

    Original file (05392-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2011. Your receipt of disability compensation from the VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03362-01

    Original file (03362-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 16 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09760-04

    Original file (09760-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board also considered your memorandum dated 16 February 2005 with references.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Per reference (a), the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07120-07

    Original file (07120-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 October 2002 for four years and were released from active duty on 21...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07753-01

    Original file (07753-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested removal of your failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board and “promotion reconsideration:” Your additional request to remove the reviewing officer ’s certification from your fitness report for 31 December 1998 to 31 July 1999 was not considered, as your previous request to remove the entire report, docket number 5441-01, was considered and denied on 30 August 2001, and you have offered no new and material supporting evidence or other...