DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LEG
Docket No: 94-08
17 December 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval.
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 December 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which
is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di
Enclosure
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS RECRUITING COMMAND
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1610
G-1
JUN 26 2008
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: ADVISORY OPINION IN THI CASE
Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 5420.193
1. The reference requests an advisory opinion from this Command
concerning the date of rank to first lieutenant.
2. After reviewing the available records, this Command
recommends disapproval. Commissioned officers with over 4 years
of prior active service as an enlisted member are entitled to
count such service for purposes of computing basic pay for
longevity purposes. First ENE i not have the
required active duty service to qualify for the special rate of
pay. aes Waiiiieie’ appeal consistently mentions his
grade while enlisted. Grade is not a deciding factor when
determining the entitlement to special rate of basic pay. Also,
personnel who have been credited with 1460 points for retirement
are eligible for the special rate of basic pay; enemies
$M cid not have the required points at the time of
‘commission which makes him ineligible for the special rate of
pay.
3. Point of contact at this Command is iia.
Gelli ac DSN 278-9430 or commercial (703) 784-9430.
: f °
CA HK, ‘ pa dinon
A. G. FERDINAND
By direction
UNITED STATES MARINE COR
THE BASIC SCHOOL
TRAINING COMMAND
24164 BELLEAU AVE
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5106
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1000
C474-PERS
10 Jul 06
From: Personnel Officer, Consolidated Administrative Center
To: Board for Correction of Naval Records
Subj: REVIEW OF OFFICER QUALIFICATION RECORD (OOR) ICO: EE...
1. After a thorough review of SNO’s OOR, it is my determination that SNO has
never been reduced in rank nor been subject of any derogatory material.
at DSN 278-5556.
CL ok
LIAMS
2. Point of Contact is
Fy cl. (\y )
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03620-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 7200 MPO-40 of 28 May 2009, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10334-05
They agreed with the reasoning of the Claims Appeal Board that “in the absence of proof that (you) spent the erroneous per-diem payments for their intended purpose, waiver of the remaining $17,351.26 is not appropriate.” Thus they found no error or injustice in the action to recoup the $17,351.26 in erroneous per-diem payments.Accordingly, your application has been denied. The activation orders authorized per diem; however, the Marine Corps cannot be liable for the erroneous actions of its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06399-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CMC memorandums 1920 MMSR-3 of 16 May 2008 and 1050 MPO-40 -of 8 August 2008, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04990-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 16 June 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06863-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative -of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. 11 May DSN: 278-0547. concerning at commercial this matter is w (703) 784-0547 or HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL ROA QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 NAVY D IN REPLY REFER TO: 107...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09230-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,ROBERT D.ZlSALMANActing Executive DirectorEnclosure UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS RECRUITING...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01388-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1100 RE-13 of 10 ApriL 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06756-98
Retirement Policy which states that Marines in the grade of Gunnery Sergeant or above, must serve two years in their current pay grade prior to transfer to retirement status. 6756-98 Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery 1. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery Sergeant petition with regard to his retirement rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06856-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01637-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference b, requires that all ISTs into the Marine Corps {reserve and active component) apply to the officer retention board.